A simple way of achieve a Lemma as I understood you want, could be this one:
\documentclass[leqno]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{ntheorem}
\newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}
\begin{document}
\begin{lemma}
On any $t-$manifold there exist $\rho \in \mathcal{C}^{\infty}(X)$
such that
\begin{equation}
\rho>0 \text{ on} X^\circ, \rho=0 \text{ on } \partial X \text{ and}
\end{equation}
in local coordinates at %
$p \in \partial X$, $\rho=a(x)x_1\dots x_k, a(p)>0$ %
where $a$ is smooth.
\end{lemma}
\end{document}
This is quite simpler than the Werner's answer. I understood that you wanted to replicate the aspect of the quoted page, in that sense I believe that the label in the middle of the text is not a problem per se, but depends on the page layout and other design decisions that are irrelevant as to how to raise a lemma. Of course you can do it in tabular form as Werner has shown you, my doubt is is it really necessary? I don't know, in my experience it's not, but there may be some context in which yes and then the Werner solution can be very useful to you. However, for the simplest thing, this may be enough.

I think the trick for this to work is to learn how to use the amsmath
package that is very helpful in cases like this one, and either theorem
or ntheorem
packages, which are the ones that make it simpler to work with phrases like lemmas. In the case of John Kormylo's answer, amsmath
is also key. Whatever the solution you prefer, I suggest you learn how to use that package.
multline
and finally I don't understand if the difficulty is to replicate the aspect of the page where the lemma you mention is.multline
environment? IMHO it's unnecessary.