3

Here is some LaTeX fragment, which requires importing amsmath and amssymb:

\begin{alignat}{2}
& \forall \left\{i_1, i_2\right\} \in \binom{\left\{1, \ldots, t\right\}}{2}: \mathcal{U}\left(s_{i_1}, b_{i_1}\right) \cap \mathcal{U}\left(s_{i_2}, b_{i_2}\right) = \emptyset \nonumber \\
\Leftrightarrow & \forall \left(\left(i_1, j_1\right), \left(i_2, j_2\right)\right) \in \mathcal{I}: 
\left(a_{i_2} z_{i_2} + \sigma_{s_{i_2}, j_2}\right) - 
\left(a_{i_1} z_{i_1} + \sigma_{s_{i_1}, j_1} + m_{j_1}\right) && \geq 0
\nonumber \\
& \vee
\left(a_{i_1} z_{i_1} + \sigma_{s_{i_1}, j_1}\right) - 
\left(a_{i_2} z_{i_2} + \sigma_{s_{i_2}, j_2} + m_{j_2}\right) && \geq 0. \label{eq:disj}
\end{alignat}

Here is how the result looks like (the number of the equation is (7) instead of (1) since it is a screenshot from a document that contains some more text and formulas).

Result

And here is how I wished that it looked like (first half of the last inequality right-aligned instead of left-aligned):

Desired result

So the question is obvious: How does not need to change the source code to get the desired result?

  • Welcome to TeX.SX! Rather than posting code snippets please give a full minimal working example. A MWE should compile and be as small as possible to demonstrate your problem. It's much easier to help you if we have full working code to start from. – Andrew Oct 14 '17 at 15:34
4

A solution with mathrlap from mathtools (needless to load amsmath). I removed almost all unnecessary \left \right pairs, and replaced the remaining one with a pair \bigl \bigr. I also took the liberty to replace \emptyset with the more correct \varnothing:

\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{geometry} 
\usepackage{amssymb, mathtools}

\begin{document}

\begin{alignat}{2}
& \forall\mathrlap{\{i_1, i_2\} \in \binom{\{1, \ldots, t\}}{2} : \mathcal{U}(s_{i_1}, b_{i_1}) \cap \mathcal{U}(s_{i_2}, b_{i_2}) = \varnothing} \nonumber & \\
\Leftrightarrow {}& \forall \bigl((i_1, j_1), t(i_2, j_2)\bigr) \in \mathcal{I}&:
(a_{i_2} z_{i_2} + \sigma_{s_{i_2}, j_2}) -
(a_{i_1} z_{i_1} + \sigma_{s_{i_1}, j_1} + m_{j_1})& \geq 0
\nonumber \\
& & \vee
(a_{i_1} z_{i_1} + \sigma_{s_{i_1}, j_1}) -
(a_{i_2} z_{i_2} + \sigma_{s_{i_2}, j_2} + m_{j_2})& \geq 0. \label{eq:disj}
\end{alignat}

\end{document}

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.