How do I specify an offset to a voltage error? As you can see (scroll down, last code block), the "u" voktage arrow looks out of place, so the question is: 1. How do I define an offset that moves the arrow to the right? 2. Is there a different way to handle arrows that "get in the way"?



  % Generalized diagram of different components inside an AC drive with voltage intermediate circuit
% Based on a template by
% Author: Erno Pentzin (2013),

\begin{circuitikz}[lbl/.style = {label={[label distance=4mm]above right:#1}}] % this line defines a new style to alter the distance of labels, mosfets due to diode and transformer label
    % top part of switch legs
    (0,0) coordinate (s1) 
    to ++ (0,-0.4)       
    %node (mosfet1) [nigfete,below,anchor=D] {$Q_1$} % old, label distance incorrect
    node (mosfet1) [nigfete,below,anchor=D,lbl=$Q_1$] {} % new, label distance ok
    (mosfet1) node (mosfet3) [nigfete,right=22mm,lbl=$Q_3$] {}
    (mosfet1.S) to [short,-*] ++ (0,-0.4)           coordinate (t1)

    % transformer
    (t1 -| mosfet3.S) % Connect Q1 with Q3S which is electrically wrong, but easier to draw  
    node (T) [transformer core,below right=0mm and 11mm]{}
    (T.base) node[label=above:$N_1:N_2$]{}

    % bottom part of switch legs
    (mosfet3.S |- T.A2)                             coordinate (t2)  % likewise counter intuitive
    to ++ (0,-0.4) 
    node (mosfet4) [nigfete,below,anchor=D,lbl=$Q_4$] {}
    (t1 |- mosfet4.D)   node (mosfet2) [nigfete,below,anchor=D,lbl=$Q_2$] {}

    % connection lines origins at transformer
    (T.A1) to                       (t1)
    (T.A2) to [short,-*]            (t2)
    (T.B1) to [short]                ++ (0.5,0)     coordinate (t3)            
    (T.B2) to [short]                ++ (0.5,0)     coordinate (t4)

    % connection lines orign at mosfet
    (t1)        to      (mosfet2.D)
    (mosfet2.S) to ++   (0,-0.4)                    coordinate (s2)
    (mosfet3.D) to ++   (0, 0.4)                    coordinate (s3)
    (mosfet3.S) to      (mosfet4.D)
    (mosfet4.S) to ++   (0,-0.4)                    coordinate (s4)

    % supply lines
    (s3) -- (s1) to [short,*-] ++(-2,0) coordinate (czk+) to[short,*-o] ++ (-0.75,0)           coordinate (s+) % added *-o, * to get dot at S1
    (s4) -- (s2) to [short,*-] ++(-2,0) coordinate (czk-) to [short,*-o] ++ (-0.75,0)           coordinate (s-) % added *-o, * to get dot at S2
    % (s+) to [open, v=60<\volt>, invert] (s-) % old, with SI unit
    (s+) to [open, v=$U_{in}$, invert] (s-) % new, with variable U_in
    % secondary side dc rectifier
    (t3) to[short,-*] ++(0.5,0) coordinate (AA) % move transformer outlet a bit to the right
    (t4) to[short,-*] ++(1.5,0) coordinate (BB) % move transformer outlet a bit to the right

    (AA) to [Do,name=d1,l=$D1$] ++(0,1.5) to[short,-*] ++(1,0)                  coordinate[label=c1] (c1)

    (AA) -- (AA |- BB) to [Do,invert,name=d2,l_=$D2$] ++(0,-1.5) to[short,-*] ++(1,0) coordinate[label=c2] (c2)
    (BB) -- (BB |- AA) to [Do,name=d3,l_=$D3$](c1)
    (BB) to [Do,invert,name=d4,l=$D4$](c2)

     % missing C_ZK inserted

     (czk+) to [C,l=$C_{ZK}$] (czk-)

     % secondary side, L, C, out
     (c1) to[L,l=$L$,-*,i=$i_L$,v=$u_L$] ++(2.5,0) coordinate(c3) to[short,-o] ++(0.75,0) coordinate (out1)
     (c3) to[C,l_=$C_{out}$,-*] (c3 |- c2) coordinate (c4) -- (c2)
     (c4) to[short,-o] ++(0.75,0)  coordinate (out2)

     % voltage arrows secondary
     (out1)   to[open, v^=$U_{out}$]    (out2) % delete later, voltage arrow
     %(c1) to[open,v^=$u_L$] (c3) % optional instead voltage arrow of L, from c1 to c3

     %THIS ONE
     (c1) to[open,v^=$u$] (c2)

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Since circuitikz is based on tikz, you can use the coordinate calculation from the tikz library calc (already loaded). So by replacing

(c1) to[open,v^=$u$] (c2)


($(c1)+(0.35,0)$) to[open,v^=$u$] ($(c2)+(0.35,0)$)

you can move the arrow a bit to the right.

  • Thanks, I thought of it the wrong way. I tried to manipulate the arrow itself, but it didn't cross my mind to manipulate the node instead ;) – SF6 Oct 24 '17 at 8:53

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.