I am setting an article using the KOMA-Script class scrartcl
. I need a footnote to the title, and I obtained it by using the \thanks
command. As per the KOMA-Script Guide, this produced an asterisk in the title and an asterisked note at the bottom of the title page preceding the numbered notes in the body of the article, beginning at number one. But I am dealing with references with biblatex-chicago
, which assigns a Chicago-style format to footnotes that begins: [indent][full-size note number on the baseline][period][space][text of note ...]. That is fine for the numbered notes, and for the spacing of the title note, which should match that of the numbered notes. However, it gives a note marker "*." which is surely wrong, and certainly not Chicago style (Online Chicago Manual para 14.24: "If a symbol rather than a number is used [...], the symbol appears as a superscript in the text but not in the note, where it is not followed by a period but may be followed by a space, as long as this is done consistently.").
How can I get "*" as the note marker, rather than "*." when annotating a title in class scrartcl?
Here is an MWE:
\documentclass[letterpaper,11pt]{scrartcl}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{ebgaramond}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage[notes,strict,backend=biber,%
bibencoding=inputenc]{biblatex-chicago}
\begin{document}
\title{Title\thanks{note}}
\maketitle
\end{document}
footmarkoff
to your biblatex-chicago options. A similar problem appeared earlier here today (tex.stackexchange.com/a/399808/105447).\thanks{\kern-5pt \textcolor{white}{\rule{5pt}{1ex}}note}
(requiresxcolor
).footmarkoff
solution would, I think, have made all my footnotes revert to the KOMA-script default format rather than the desired Chicago style, and i wasn't sure how to integrate lockstep's solution with\thanks
.\thanks
is the same dot as the dot of a normal\footnote
. An this is what @BenBrewster wants to get rid off.