Conferences whose proceedings are published by the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) usually demand authors to use the AAAI latex package. The package provides a bibtex .bst
file, with no apparent support for biblatex
.
Here is a minimal example showing the result obtained with the official bibtex
style.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{aaai}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\begin{filecontents}{biblio.bib}
@article{Stark04,
author = {T. Stark},
title = {{M}aintaining {K}nowledge about {W}eaponry},
journal = {International Journal of Armored Weapons},
volume = {26},
number = {11},
pages = {832--843},
year = {2004}
}
@incollection{Riddle94,
author = {T. M. Riddle},
title = {{I}ntegrating {P}otions and {D}eath {E}aters},
editor = {Mary Zen and Mark S. Furling},
booktitle = {Intelligent Magic},
publisher = {Morgan Kaufmann},
year = 1994,
pages = {169--212},
chapter = 6
}
@inproceedings{LutorK17,
author = {L. Lutor and C. Kent},
title = {
{On The Effects of Mineral Mining from Alien Planets}
},
booktitle = {
{Proc. of the 31st {AAAI} Conference on Alien
Intelligence}
},
pages = {3547--3554},
year = {2017}
}
\end{filecontents}
\title{How to be published on comics and fantasy books}
\author{Stan Lee}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\section{Introduction}
It is always good to cite \cite{Riddle94,Stark04} and acknowledge
\cite{LutorK17}.
\lipsum[1-5]
\bibliographystyle{aaai}
\bibliography{biblio.bib}
\end{document}
The citation style itself is like (Author Name et al. 1999)
, while the bibliography is rendered in the normal way, I suppose. The example shows a conference paper, a collection chapter and a journal article.
Is there some unofficial AAAI biblatex
style out there to obtain the same results, or can you suggest me how to configure biblatex
to obtain the same bibliography appearance (the citation style is quite standard)?
\usepackage[style=authoryear-icomp]biblatex
but if you are submitting to AAAI you should use their style. Why do you want to change? – CarLaTeX Nov 10 '17 at 6:42biblatex
is more convenient to use for authoring, commands are more flexible and configurable. The style is ok, I don't want to change how it appears. Anyway, they don't care which is the actual code used to produce the output as long as it looks the same, and even if they cared, they'd only care at the time of submission of the camera-ready copy, not initially. – gigabytes Nov 10 '17 at 7:10biblatex
is not really of use if you have to switch back to the provided.bst
file later. Most publishers really can't handlebiblatex
. Given the fact that there is a.bst
by the publisher it is unlikely that there is abiblatex
copy of it. So you are asking us to provide the full style for you. I don't think that is a particular well suited request at this side, but questions like this have been answered before. – moewe Nov 10 '17 at 8:45style=authoryear-icomp
. I don't want to spend hours analysing the AAAI style for you. – moewe Nov 10 '17 at 8:48