Guidelines for customizing biblatex styles says:

Finally, assuming that I'll want to use my style adjustments in a multitude of documents: Where do I put the relevant macro stuff?

The recommended answer is a copy of biblatex.cfg in one's local texmf tree. However, going away from above precondition:

What are all the places, i.e. file types and respective locations, where I can put biblatex style modifications?

I know you can write your own bbx and cbx styles, and there's probably a way to put modifications directly in a tex file? What are the limitations, advantages and disadvantages of each of these, which kind of modification typically goes where, which overrule others ...?


2 Answers 2


I am not sure to correctly understand your questions, but the BibLaTeX style files can be put in:

/texmf/tex/latex/biblatex/bbx ---> .bbx files (= bibliographies)
/texmf/tex/latex/biblatex/cbx ---> .cbx files (= in text citations)
/texmf/tex/latex/biblatex/lbx ---> .lbx files (= language strings)
/texmf/tex/latex/biblatex/    ---> other files (.cfg for instance)

You can put most modifications directly in a .cls, .sty or .tex file as well (I say "most" to be on the safe side, I have not tried extensively but so far everything I have modified in a .tex file has worked).

The last modification overrides the previous ones as usual. Indeed, if you are writing in a .tex file, you must input your modifications after loading BibLaTeX, because it creates the macros and commands you will be using.

If you have somewhat significant modifications to make, it is better to put them in a dedicated style file in texmf, so as not to clutter your other files. Also, you can load any style file as an option to the biblatex package – which seems more appropriate than inputing / loading a separate file. (But nothing prevents you from making shortcuts to your style files if you are lazy to navigate texmf every time you want to change them.)

Whenever you make a style file, whatever method you pick, you run the risk that a BibLaTeX update may cause some errors (although it is very rare).

Edit (trying to make my answer more complete)

As regards writing style files, I would suggest finding the one that is closest to your needs in the texmf-dist folder, duplicating it to texmf and then modifying it. This way you can learn from the style, and you have something to start from.

As regards .bbx files, as hinted above they are used for typesetting the entire bibliography. Many styles eventually load standard.bbx. A typical file will contain some information about formatting fields (\DeclareFieldFormat), some information about formatting entries (\DeclareBibliographyDriver) and various user (re)defined macros.

In .cbx files, you will find some information about formatting fields (\DeclareFieldFormat) and the definition of various citation commands (\DeclareCiteCommand and \DeclareMultiCiteCommand). The latter are also implemented through macros.

The .lbx files contain language related information, which typically includes some typographic settings for the specific language, and the strings that BibLaTeX will use when printing citations and bibliographies (\DeclareBibliographyStrings).

  • Is there a reason for putting them in /texmf/tex/latex/, rather than, say, /texmf/tex/generic/? Granted, I just tested using a custom .bbx file in /texmf/tex/latex/ with xelatex and it seems to work just fine.
    – Adam Liter
    Jun 6, 2015 at 19:03
  • I am not sure (and didn't test), but BibLaTeX sits in the /latex/ folder, and that is why we usually put everything in there… I am not sure whether it would find it in another folder. Besides, using the same folder tree as for BibLaTeX makes it easier to find. If you try another folder, please let me know.
    – ienissei
    Jun 10, 2015 at 8:35
  • A very belated answer to my own question: if you take a look at A Directory Structure for TeX Files, which explains the TDS in more detail, it seems that generic is reserved for things that work with all formats, including plain, not things that only work with certain formats.
    – Adam Liter
    Aug 8, 2015 at 18:30

The using of biblatex.cfg is recommend to get a clear main file and to get a structured header.

The place of the cfg-file depends of the using. If the cfg-file is relevant for only one or two projects you should put the cfg-file in the working directory.

If you create your own cfg-file for your daily work I recommend the local texmf tree. The easiest way to find the predefined folder is to use the following command:

kpsewhich --var-value TEXMFHOME

In my case the result is /home/marco/texmf. It seems that this input doesn't work with MikTeX.

TEXMFHOME, like all trees, must be organized according to the TDS, or files may not be found.

The limitation of the cfg file is equal to cbx and bbx files. Commands which are defined for lbx files (language) don't work inside the cfg-files.

  • Is kpsexpand perhaps Linux-specific? It doesn't work in my Win 7 command line.
    – doncherry
    Jan 7, 2012 at 15:11
  • @doncherry kpsexpand is a deprecated command; its "modern" form is kpsewhich --var-value TEXMFHOME. kpsewhich is surely available with TeX Live, but I'm afraid it isn't with MiKTeX (at least with the full power it has on TeX Live).
    – egreg
    Jan 7, 2012 at 15:52
  • @doncherry: I'm running TeX Live 2011 on Windows 7 which allows kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFHOME'. Does that work?
    – Werner
    Jan 7, 2012 at 16:02
  • I'm using MiKTeX 2.9, and kpsewhich usually works, e.g. kpsewhich geometry.sty. @egreg's suggestion doesn't return anything, @Werner's returns '$TEXMFHOME'.
    – doncherry
    Jan 7, 2012 at 16:20
  • @doncherry: I have a wild guess: for some reason, TEXMFHOME is not set at all. I get the same behaviour with MiKTeX 2.9 in one of my machines - an empty TEXMFHOME. If I ask kpsewhich to expand some of my environment variables, say, kpsewhich --var-value $HOME, I get a proper output for that variable. Jan 7, 2012 at 16:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .