Why does scaling not apply to node and how to correctly scale a node in TikZ? [duplicate]

Question

The following code and its output shows that although the line drawn is scaled, the rectangle node is not scaled.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tikz}
\begin{document}

\section*{Without Scaling}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node at (0, 0) [rectangle,draw,minimum size=5cm] {A};
\draw (-2.5, 1) -- (2.5, 1) node[midway,below] {B};
\end{tikzpicture}

\section*{With Scaling}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.5]
\node at (0, 0) [rectangle,draw,minimum size=5cm] {A};
\draw (-2.5, 1) -- (2.5, 1) node[midway,below] {B};
\end{tikzpicture}

\end{document}

What is the right/recommended way to scale a tikzpicture such that:

• All drawings are scaled.
• All nodes are scaled.
• But text is not scaled.

Answer 1

This answer explains the differences between the main ways of scaling things, namely \resizebox, \scalebox, scale, and transform canvas (or transform shape). I think scale with a little tweaking is your best option (the others change the size of everything, including text). Here is a solution where you define a new command that will be your scaling factor, and then use it in the appropriate spots (so as to not repeat changes). The code:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tikz}
\begin{document}

\section*{Without Scaling}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node at (0, 0) [rectangle,draw,minimum size=5cm] {A};
\draw (-2.5, 1) -- (2.5, 1) node[midway,below] {B};
\end{tikzpicture}

\section*{With Scaling}
\newcommand\scaler{.5}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=\scaler]
\node at (0, 0) [rectangle,draw,minimum size=\scaler*5cm] {A};
\draw (-2.5, 1) -- (2.5, 1) node[midway,below] {B};
\end{tikzpicture}

\end{document}

The result:

Answer 2

You mean something like this?

   \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1]
    \node at (0, 0) [rectangle,draw,minimum size=5cm] { A};
    \draw (-2.5, 1) -- (2.5, 1) node[midway,below] {\scriptsize B};
    \end{tikzpicture}