In LaTeX, you can use \char` followed by a symbol to get that symbol. For example \char`b or \char`\b would just yield the letter b.

  • Which symbols/letters does that work for? Two cases I've found that yield different symbols are \char`{ and \char`}. Is there any sort of reason why those two don't work the way you would think?
  • Why does this happen in the first place? Just typing out `b doesn't give you anything special, so why does it work in the context of a \char?
  • Why is the backslash ignored in things like \char`\_ when there's a valid command for \_?

I'm still new to LaTeX and it's hard to Google symbol-related stuff like this, so that's why I'm asking here. Thanks in advance.

  • Welcome to TeX.SX! – Bobyandbob Nov 22 '17 at 9:31
  • 1
    I recommend Donald Knuth's book "The TeXbook". It gives you complete information on low level TeX commands, and exercises to test your understanding. – Benjamin McKay Nov 22 '17 at 10:45
  • 1
    The backtick is explained in the answer below, but note also that \char is not a latex command and shouldn't be used in documents, the latex version is \symbol which takes a standard latex brace syntax so \symbol{`b} or \symbol{64} or whatever. – David Carlisle Nov 22 '17 at 17:03

It is a misunderstanding to attach the left quote to the \char command as you do by writing \char`.

\char expects as argument a number. With the left quote you are converting the next character or single-character command to its character code (which is a number) if TeX is currently looking for a number.

So `b and `\b both give the number 62 in such a context.

You can use this syntax in all places where a number is expected:


\setlength\parskip{`b pt}




The backslash is needed only for special chars. E.g. `\%, `\{, `\}, `\\ but it doesn't harm to add it always. In this context it gives the character "itself".

  • 2
    Perhaps expand on the backslash rule here? It's a TeX, not a LaTeX, convention ... – Joseph Wright Nov 22 '17 at 9:58
  • 2
    perhaps worth mentioning that perhaps surprisingly \char`~ is ok, despite the character being active. Or \char`: with babel-french. (or \number\numexpr`~\relax) – user4686 Nov 22 '17 at 11:01
  • 2
    The backslash is not actually needed for { and }, unless this would leave unbalanced braces (in a \def, for instance). – egreg Nov 22 '17 at 14:37
  • @jfbu It works because it's not expanded at all, right? I don't know myself, I'm curious. Also why does \char`^ works but \char`^^a gives something else hahahhah nah, I'm joking. – Manuel Nov 22 '17 at 15:05
  • @Manuel yes it is not expanded at all. If you use " for hexadecimal input or ' for octal input in a context where TeX expects a number, expansion happens (and of course expansion happens also without prefix), hence surprise with ` when one has not read the TeXBook closely ;-). Edit to my comment above I should have given \number`~ as example. btw, this swallows one space token if it comes next. – user4686 Nov 22 '17 at 17:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.