In LaTeX, you can use \char` followed by a symbol to get that symbol. For example \char`b or \char`\b would just yield the letter b.

  • Which symbols/letters does that work for? Two cases I've found that yield different symbols are \char`{ and \char`}. Is there any sort of reason why those two don't work the way you would think?
  • Why does this happen in the first place? Just typing out `b doesn't give you anything special, so why does it work in the context of a \char?
  • Why is the backslash ignored in things like \char`\_ when there's a valid command for \_?

I'm still new to LaTeX and it's hard to Google symbol-related stuff like this, so that's why I'm asking here. Thanks in advance.

  • Welcome to TeX.SX!
    – Bobyandbob
    Nov 22, 2017 at 9:31
  • 1
    I recommend Donald Knuth's book "The TeXbook". It gives you complete information on low level TeX commands, and exercises to test your understanding. Nov 22, 2017 at 10:45
  • 1
    The backtick is explained in the answer below, but note also that \char is not a latex command and shouldn't be used in documents, the latex version is \symbol which takes a standard latex brace syntax so \symbol{`b} or \symbol{64} or whatever. Nov 22, 2017 at 17:03

1 Answer 1


It is a misunderstanding to attach the left quote to the \char command as you do by writing \char`.

\char expects as argument a number. With the left quote you are converting the next character or single-character command to its character code (which is a number) if TeX is currently looking for a number.

So `b and `\b both give the number 62 in such a context.

You can use this syntax in all places where a number is expected:


\setlength\parskip{`b pt}




The backslash is needed only for special chars. E.g. `\%, `\{, `\}, `\\ but it doesn't harm to add it always. In this context it gives the character "itself".

  • 2
    Perhaps expand on the backslash rule here? It's a TeX, not a LaTeX, convention ...
    – Joseph Wright
    Nov 22, 2017 at 9:58
  • 2
    perhaps worth mentioning that perhaps surprisingly \char`~ is ok, despite the character being active. Or \char`: with babel-french. (or \number\numexpr`~\relax)
    – user4686
    Nov 22, 2017 at 11:01
  • 2
    The backslash is not actually needed for { and }, unless this would leave unbalanced braces (in a \def, for instance).
    – egreg
    Nov 22, 2017 at 14:37
  • @jfbu It works because it's not expanded at all, right? I don't know myself, I'm curious. Also why does \char`^ works but \char`^^a gives something else hahahhah nah, I'm joking.
    – Manuel
    Nov 22, 2017 at 15:05
  • 1
    @Erwann \int_eval:n {`A} if you want the character number. Or \char_value_catcode:n {`A} if you want the category code. You need to escape special characters. But \int_eval:n is not needed where an integer denotation is expected.
    – egreg
    Jan 2 at 21:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.