I would appreciate if someone could help me in solving a "font puzzle". I am trying different ways to typeset a text in cyrillic.
First example of code, compiled with pdfLaTeX:
\documentclass[14pt]{extreport}
\usepackage[T2A]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[russian]{babel}
%--------------------------------------
\begin{document}
Еще недавно ему часто
\end{document}
Second example of code, compiled with LuaLaTeX:
\documentclass[14pt]{extreport}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{polyglossia}
\usepackage{unicode-math}
\setmainlanguage{russian}
\setmainfont{CMU Serif}
%------------------------
\begin{document}
Еще недавно ему часто
\end{document}
The output can be seen below:
The second fragment of code produces somewhat "thicker" type of font, whereas the first fragment, compiled with pdfLaTeX, gives a "thinner", more elegant letters(seen below in the picture).
My questions: 1) what are reasons for this difference? 2) Is it possible to obtain same "thin" font, albeit with LuaLaTeX-suitable code?
pdffonts
to check which fonts are used in the pdf.babel
instead ofpolyglossia
for the LuaLaTeX-based case?