I saw this page:

Differences between \stackrel and \stackbin

and know now to use overset & underset instead of stackrel or stackbin. I have a equation,

\omega^{(1)}_{2}(s_0,s_1) &\sim \sum_i \operatorname{Res}_{q\to a_i} K(s_0,q) \left\{ \omega^{(0)}_3(q,\bar{q},s_1) + {}^1_{h=0}\left[ \left(_{I=\varnothing}^{J=\{s_1\}} \omega^{(0)}_1(q) \cdot \omega^{(1)}_2(\bar{q},s_1) \right) +    \right. \right.  \\
    & \left. \left.  + \left( \omega^{(0)}_2(q,s_1)\cdot \omega^{(1)}_1(\bar{q}) \right) \right] + \left[ \left( \omega^{(1)}_1(q) \cdot \omega^{(0)}_2(\bar{q},s_1) \right) + \cancel{\left( \omega^{(1)}_2(q,s_1) \cdot \omega^{(0)}_1(\bar{q}) \right)} \right]  \right\}

Specifically, I want to put objects above and below things like \left(, \left[, and \left\{, e.g.

{}^1_{h=0}\left[ \left(_{I=\varnothing}^{J=\{s_1\}}

In the first one (above) I tried a "ghost" {} but doesn't look good. The second one I tried using the braces but that also does not work.

How can I put math or text above and below extensible parenthesis, braces and brackets.



enter image description here

I agree with you that 
{}^1_{h=0}\left[ \left(_{I=\varnothing}^{J=\{s_1\}}\right.\right.
looks ugly. However, one can always resort to \verb|\vphantom|s,
and here is a command for that
with usage \#
  • This is a nice tool! Whether one chooses to include #7, or if one is concerned about how a complicated experssion may not work in this construct, I notice it also works on each end, e.g. \begin{align} \BracketsWithLimits{[}{i=1}{n}{.}{}{}{\displaystyle \cancel{\int_0^1f(x)\, \mathrm{d}x}} \end{align} – nate Jan 7 '18 at 3:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.