2

I cannot get lualatex (MacTeX2017, updated this morning) to use font names. It seems only to want to use font file names.

% !TEX encoding = UTF-8 Unicode
% !TEX TS-program = LuaLaTeX

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{fontspec}

%% This works:
\setmainfont{GalliardPro-Roman}[%
    BoldFont=GalliardPro-Bold,
    ItalicFont=GalliardPro-Italic,
    BoldItalicFont=GalliardPro-BoldItalic]

%% This does not:   
%\setmainfont{ITC Galliard Pro Roman}

\begin{document}

Some text. \textbf{Some text.} \emph{Some Text.} \textbf{\emph{Some Text.}}

\end{document}

If I use the font name as the argument to \setmainfont, I get this error:

luaotfload | resolve : sequence of 3 lookups yielded nothing appropriate.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
./mwe-lua.tex:15: fontspec error: "font-not-found"
! 
! The font "ITCGalliardProRoman" cannot be found.
! 
! See the fontspec documentation for further information.
! 
! For immediate help type H <return>.
!...............................................  

l.15    \setmainfont{ITC Galliard Pro Roman}

I have put symlinks to the font files in ~/Library/Fonts and luaotfload-tool seems happy with that. However, looking at luaotfload-names.lua (from ~/Library/texlive/2017/texmf-var/luatex-cache/generic/names) I note that ["plainname"]="GalliardPro-Roman" is given for 'ITC Galliard Pro Roman', whereas in previous years (2015 for example) this is given as ["plainname"]="ITC Galliard Pro Roman"

I have no substantive problem with using the font file name if I have to (though the fontspec documentation states that either the font name or the font file name can be used), but would rather have the convenience of using the font name instead.

Puzzled.

  • 1
    Can you reproduce with a font other people have? – cfr Jan 30 '18 at 0:22
  • Have you tried “ITC Galliard Pro,” without the “Roman”? That works for me with an up-to-date TeX Live on GNU/Linux. \setmainfont{ITC Galliard Pro}[Numbers={OldStyle,Proportional},StylisticSet=1] – Thérèse Jan 30 '18 at 1:32
  • @Thérèse Spot on! That would seem to argue that the font's "family name" is used -- which makes sense. But some tests with other fonts (Monotype Centaur) don't confirm that, but a test with 'STIX Two Text' (sourceforge.net/projects/stixfonts) seems to. Interesting. Thanks. – sgmoye Jan 30 '18 at 12:31
  • @cfr Not yet. For a while, I wondered if the font family name was being used, but that does not seem to be always the case. I will keep looking. – sgmoye Jan 30 '18 at 12:33
  • I think that I can confirm that luaotfload-tool/luatex now uses the font family name (in addition to the PostScript name) to select fonts. As I said, this is reasonable, but is this a change? – sgmoye Jan 30 '18 at 13:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.