Here is my workflow: Zotero -> LyZ plugin for Zotero -> export reference to a *.bib file -> use *.bib file for LyX -> insert citation in LyX document.

The LyZ plugin exports an item's bibliographic information to the *.bib database. Examining the record for a specific item, I see the Date field is "January 1, 2014" and the Year field is empty.

I'm using Version 2.3.0rc2 of LyX, which adds BibLaTeX support in LyX. But I had the same problem with an earlier, stable version that implemented BibLaTeX in LyX using ERT.

The document is set up to use the Chicago author-date style.

The problem is that even though there's a date for the record, it's not making its way into the document.

Could someone please suggest how to troubleshoot?

Added 2/17/18: As mentioned, I'm really looking for guidance on how to troubleshoot the problem.

Since I first posted, I'm seeing that LyX has far more bibliographic entries than are in the attached *.bib file. I suspect this is because to create the current *.lyx file I copied a *.lyx file from an earlier paper, deleted the text, reset the appropriate document settings, and pointed the document to a different (new) *.bib file. But now I have no idea how to get rid of the bibliography entries that are in the *.lyx document but not in the attached *.bib file.

FWIW, here's an example of a bib entry that's causing problems. This one happens to be in the attached *.bib file:

    title = {Class Monopoly Rent and the Contemporary Neoliberal City},
    volume = {8},
    rights = {{\textcopyright} 2014 The Author(s). Geography Compass {\textcopyright} 2014 John Wiley \& Sons Ltd},
    issn = {1749-8198},
    url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gec3.12107/abstract},
    doi = {10.1111/gec3.12107},
    language = {en},
    issue = {1},
    pages = {13-24},
    journaltitle = {Geography Compass},
    author = {Anderson, Matthew B.},
    urldate = {2015-05-28},
    date = {January 1, 2014},
    note = {00004},
    keywords = {HARVEY, David, neoliberalism, Chicago (Ill.), Economic policy, ECONOMICS, Have read}
  • 2
    you mean you have literally "January 1, 2014" in the bib? That's the wrong format, the date should be 2014-01-01. – Ulrike Fischer Feb 15 '18 at 21:57
  • 2
    The first step would be to show us the offending .bib entry. It will also help if you could obtain the .blg log file. – moewe Feb 15 '18 at 22:05
  • Comment deleted because bib entry is too long. – Gnosos Feb 17 '18 at 12:59
  • 1
    Given the entry you have now shown us, we see Ulrike Fisher's comment was spot on: you should use date = {2014-01-01},. – gusbrs Feb 17 '18 at 13:24
  • @UlrikeFischer Since you gave the right suggestion, would you care to write an answer? – moewe Feb 18 '18 at 14:35

The format of the date field is wrong. All date fields should adhere to iso8601-2 Extended Format specification level 1. See section 2.3.8 Date and Time Specifications in the biblatex specification. In your case the field should look like this:

  date = {2014-01-01},
  • I believe Zotero allows dates like "January 1, 2014." Also, since it scrapes dates from sources on the Web, it takes what the source offers. Reformatting the date correctly for the *.bib is, I believe, the responsibility of the exporter. In my case, this is LyZ with Better Bib(La)TeX. I'm currently investigating why it's not converting "January 1, 2014" to "2014-01-01". – Gnosos Feb 20 '18 at 3:14
  • If BBT does not convert this to 2014-01-01, please report it on github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues. I'll be happy to get this sorted. – retorquere Aug 28 '18 at 9:53

I had the same problem exporting Zotero to a .bib file. For me, it was due to the fact Zotero exports using the "BibLaTex" format instead of "Bibtex" format. It results in a .bib file with a "date" field instead of a "year" field. You just have to insure you use the "Bibtex" format when exporting.

  • 3
    That advice does specifically not apply when one is using biblatex. The question mentions biblatex in the tags, title and body text, so I think we can assume that this answer is not really to the point. – moewe Jul 23 '18 at 9:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.