Here is my code:

code screenshot

As you can see, TeX Studio doesn't recognize the proof environment. Nonetheless, I have activated the amsmath package in the preferences:

preferences screenshot

So why isn't it working? I have tried restarting the PC to see if it would load the package but it didn't work.

I am using the ProTeXt packages. The output file looks fine.

  • 2
    amsmath doesn't deal with theorem-like environments, that is what amsthm does. Try activating the cwl for amsthm. – Torbjørn T. Feb 26 '18 at 10:38
  • @TorbjørnT. Did that, but still marks the syntax as incorrect. I've also added a \usepackage{asmthm} command at the beginning. – Anakhand Feb 26 '18 at 10:46
  • You had \usepackage{amsthm} already, no need for more than one. But I think I realized your mistake. The proof environment itself is recognized (not highlighted in red), but the thing is that it is not a math environment. To use math inside a proof, you need e.g. $...$ for inline math, or an align environment for multi-line math with alignment. – Torbjørn T. Feb 26 '18 at 10:51
  • Please, don't post screen shots, rather paste your code. – bmv Feb 26 '18 at 10:54
  • @bmv I posted a screenshot rather than pasted the code because I wanted to show how TeX Studio was highlighting the syntax (to indicate that it didn't recognize it) – Anakhand Feb 26 '18 at 11:03

You're actually not describing the problem correctly. When TeXstudio fails to recognize an environment, it is the \begin and \end that are highlighted red. For example if I add an environment foo, I get this:

unrecognized env in TeXstudio

The "unrecognized command" popup comes from hovering the mouse cursor over \begin. (Sorry, it didn't show up in screenshot.)

The problem you're facing is a different one: that you've used math mode-only code outside of math mode. The proof environment does not start math mode. And TeXstudio tells you that this is the case:

TeXstudio: math command outside math env

Additional note

I just saw that you're using $$ ... $$ for displayed math. Don't do this, use \begin{equation*} ... \end{equation*} or \[ .. \] instead, see Why is \[ … \] preferable to $$?

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.