If you are looking for help with biblatex
and Biber for arXiv uploads, have a look at https://github.com/plk/biblatex/wiki/biblatex-and-the-arXiv and Biblatex and arxiv, error as well.
Overleaf users may be interested in https://www.overleaf.com/learn/how-to/LaTeX_checklist_for_arXiv_submissions.
There are several things going on here, so I think it is important to understand the big picture first.
biblatex
vs BibTeX - biber
vs. bibtex
There is a difference between bibtex
(the program/"backend") and "the BibTeX way of producing a bibliography". That distinction becomes relevant if biblatex
is introduced into the equation. The "BibTeX way of producing a bibliography" is just one way to get a bibliography in LaTeX, other options include biblatex
and the manual way with thebibliography
(the LaTeX Wikibook lists several ways to produce a bibliography in detail, and also in a short overview). The BibTeX way of producing a bibliography is of course tied to using bibtex
(the program), a manual thebibliography
needs no additional helper program, and biblatex
can run with either its dedicated Biber backend (preferred) or with bibtex
. Please read bibtex vs. biber and biblatex vs. natbib for more explanations on this. For a great explanation of the roles of the backend (bibtex
or Biber), see Question mark or bold citation key instead of citation number.
.bbl
files and their differences between biblatex
and BibTeX
The role that the .bbl
file plays with biblatex
and the BibTeX-way are similar, but .bbl
files produced for the two possible ways differ significantly. If you use the BibTeX-way, the BibTeX run will produce a .bbl
file that contains the bibliography exactly as it should appear in the document, it is formatted and sorted. With biblatex
the .bbl
file does not contain the finished bibliography, instead it contains the data of the entries in a format digestible by LaTeX along with a few bits and pieces of extra information that is not present in the .bib
file (disambiguation, automatically calculated labels, ...); the entries are also sorted.
A .bbl
file created for the BibTeX way of making bibliographies is completely incompatible with the .bbl
file produced for biblatex
(either by bibtex
or Biber).
You are using biblatex
with Biber as backend (a good choice), your document (drawing from the comments) looks roughly like
\documentclass[british]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage{csquotes}
\usepackage[backend=biber,style=ieee-alphabetic,sorting=nyvt]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\begin{document}
\cite{sigfridsson}
\printbibliography
\end{document}
A document like this will always expect a .bbl
file as produced by Biber. Even if you change backend=biber
to backend=bibtex
, the .bbl
file must have been created by BibTeX for use with biblatex
, it can't come from a document that does not use biblatex
. The .bbl
file produced for
\documentclass[british]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage{csquotes}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\bibliographystyle{alphaurl}
\begin{document}
\cite{sigfridsson}
\bibliography{biblatex-examples}
\end{document}
can not be used for biblatex
.
What the error message is about
Whatever you do, you can't mix and match between those two approaches on your local machine and the arXiv version. This is why you are seeing the error message
! Package biblatex Error: File 'xxxxxxx.bbl' not created by biblatex.
The paper you submitted to the arXiv uses biblatex
(with Biber!), while the .bbl
you submitted with it was produced by bibtex
for the BibTeX way of creating bibliographies.
Submitting the correct .bbl
to the arXiv
BibTeX
If you go with the BibTeX-way you can simply upload the .bbl
to the arXiv and you are good - of course the paper you upload must then also use the BibTeX-way, so it should look like the second code example and not like the first.
biblatex
If you use biblatex
you will have to make sure that the .bbl
you upload is compatible with the version of biblatex
and Biber on the arXiv (at present that is biblatex
3.7 and Biber 2.7, see Biblatex and arxiv, error and Which biblatex/biber version produces BBL format 2.8?) - again, naturally the .tex
file you upload must use biblatex
as well. In practice that means that you have to run the same versions of biblatex
and Biber on your local machine that the arXiv are running. See Matching biblatex in two machines for an explanation why that is necessary.
If you use biblatex
it is not that relevant for the arXiv whether you use bibtex
or Biber as backend. While the general rule is that using the bibtex
backend offers fewer features and is more stable (in terms of new features) than Biber, the relevant changes to the .bbl
file version normally affect both bibtex
and Biber. The fact that biblatex.bst
in general is quite stable (many new features require Biber) could be reason to hope that using bibtex
as backend may be a way to avoid .bbl
version incompatibilities. Normally, however, if changes are required to the .bbl
format, biblatex.bst
must change as well (sometimes this is forgotten and can cause other issue, but you should not rely on the forgetfulness of the developers). So you should not have a significant advantage in using backend=bibtex
here, we will therefore stick to backend=biber
.
Get the correct system
So you need to install the correct version of biblatex
and Biber (along with all the dependencies) on your system. The arXiv is running a TeX live 2016 system with updated packages, if you did not save a snapshot of a TeX live 2016 system at the time the arXiv updated their system, there is little chance you are going to be able to recreate the exact system they are running. As far as biblatex
and Biber are concerned, you should be good with an un-updated TeX live 2017. You can get historic TeX live releases from ftp://tug.org/texlive/historic/ and How to install "vanilla" TeXLive on Debian or Ubuntu? explains how to install such a system (see also TeX Archaeology - Installing historic/old TeX Live Releases). Do not install this system over you current system, it is possible to install several TeX live versions alongside each other without interference, see Using two installs of texlive in parallel.
.bbl
file? To successfully compile a document usingbiblatex
on the arXiv you need the exact same version ofbiblatex
that they are running (biblatex
3.7/Bibwe 2.7: tex.stackexchange.com/q/358831/35864, tex.stackexchange.com/q/415703/35864). In fact you can submit a.bbl
file written by Biber as long as it was written by the correct version of Biber. A.bbl
file written by BibTeX must also come from the same version ofbiblatex
as on the arXiv. ...biblatex.bst
is changed not as often as Biber's internals makes it more likely that a BibTeX-generated.bbl
will conform with the version requirements of the arXiv than a Biber-generated one. But if you are usingbiblatex
v3.8 or later both Biber and BibTeX should not work for you. So the only answer is: Get the versions ofbiblatex
and Biber that the arXiv is running and compile your document using these versions.