Correctly scaling a tikzpicture

I was wondering which is the correct way to scale a tikzpicture.

I tried with

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.50]


but what I obtain is that distances between elements are scaled but not their sizes or text size too. It's like if the picture collapses on itself, without correctly scaling (as I would imagine, like having a zoom factor)

Am I missing something? Should I use a different command or what?

You could try using the command \resizebox. You enclose the tikzpicture environment in one of those and then in is scaled. Like this:

\resizebox{<horizontal size>}{<vertical size>}{%
\begin{tikzpicture}

\end{tikzpicture}
}


If you want the image to be scaled proportionally, you can give one of the sizes and put ! in the other. There is also a \scalebox{<factor>}{...} macro which allows scaling by a factor. This works well except when the tikzpicture has a matrix command, and the columns are separated by &, in that case, you can change the column separator using the option ampersand replacement in the matrix options as stated in the pgfmanual.

Alternatively use the adjustbox package which provides an adjustbox environment which also allows resizing and scaling while allowing for special content including catcode changes required for verbatim text and the aforementioned &.

• \scalebox worked great for me! – Michael Mior Jul 5 '18 at 17:28

Pgf has two different types of transformations: coordinate transformations and canvas transformations. When using \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.50], you are applying coordinate transformation. All coordinates will be scaled, whereas individual objects (text, line thickness, rounding of corners etc) will not scale. Most of the time that is what you want, you do not want to scale carefully typeset pieces of text, you do not want to make lines ridiculously thick, or too thin to actually print.

If you want to scale everything, you have to use a canvas transformation. For that, pgf has a command \pgftransformscale{}. You can also use the pgflowlevelscope environment:

\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw (0,0) rectangle (6,6); %create a bounding box to reserve space
\begin{pgflowlevelscope}{\pgftransformscale{5}}
\draw (0,0) -- (1,1) node[right]{$x$};
\end{pgflowlevelscope}
\end{tikzpicture}


You can also use \pgflowlevelsynccm which synchronizes the canvas transformation matrix with the current coordinate transformation matrix, for example like this:

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=5]
\draw (0,0) rectangle (1.2,1.2); %create a bounding box to reserve space
\pgflowlevelsynccm
\draw (0,0) -- (1,1) node[right]{$x$};
\end{tikzpicture}


Note that because pgf does not (cannot) keep track of the canvas transformations (they are performed by the backend), you will have to make sure there is enough space in your picture for the scaled objects. In the examples above, I try to reserve space by drawing a bounding box first, before applying the canvas transformation. There are other problems with canvas transformations, and I do not recommend using them without carefully reading appropriate parts of the pgf manual.

I include this answer more as an explanation of what is going on, another, preferable answer using \resizebox has already appeared.

• +1 but maybe your first rectangle should be sized (6,6) to show that both examples lead to the same result – Christian Oct 20 '10 at 17:59
• pgflowlevelsynccm reduces the size nicely, but the figure is shifted toward the text and overlaps with the text. I have tried vspace, newpage and all sorts of things but it is a mess. What could be going on here? Thanks. – Herman Jaramillo Jul 11 at 21:50

You can use the option "transform shape" for the whole picture, a scope or a single node. Example:

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2, transform shape]
\draw rectangle (1,1) node {foo};
\end{tikzpicture}

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2]
\draw rectangle (1,1) node {bar};
\end{tikzpicture}


But be careful, this will not solve all your cases with scaling tikz pictures, e.g."rounded corners" will not scale. The tikz authors (general) advice is not to scale graphics.

With newer versions of TikZ, you can also use the transform canvas option, as detailed in section 25.4 of the TikZ 3.00 manual:

\begin{tikzpicture}[transform canvas={scale=2.0}]
\node{blubb};
\end{tikzpicture}


One tends to define a base length and draw everything in terms of it. This seems to scale nicely and avoids some of the draw backs of post-scaling.

\makeatletter
\newlength{\b@sis}
\tikzset{
basis/.code={\setlength{\b@sis}{#1}}, % TikZ assignment code
basis/.default=1em,                   % Provide a default (\b@sis is undefined/unassigned)
basis,                                % Set initial Value (\b@sis is defined/assigned)
}
\makeatother


Sometimes one needs to control this from their text as well. For this one proposes the following broken code. (I haven't required this functionality yet so never fixed it. One can set the value but retrieving it seems rather tricky.)

\usepackage{xparse}
\makeatletter
\NewDocumentCommand{\basis}{g}{
\IfValueTF{#1}
{
\setlength{\b@sis}{#1}
}{
% This part is broken
%\b@sis     % Ideally one would return the measurement
%\the\b@sis % One could return a string but this is not much use
}
}
\makeatother


Finally to test the code use the following in your

\makeatletter
\tikzset{
test/.pic={
code={\node[draw] at (0,-\b@sis) {\the\b@sis};
\node[draw] at (0, \b@sis) {Basis :};}},
}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
\tikz \pic {test};
\end{document}


Provided \basis works correctly then one could also use the following within their text

\tikz \draw (-\basis,-\basis) -- (\basis,\basis);


Warning: use at your own risk, nesting tikzpictures not recommended

You could put the tikzpicture into a node, and scale the node

\tikz \node [scale=0.5, inner sep=0] {
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw [line width=10pt] (0,0) rectangle (1,1);
\node at (0.5,0.5) {abc};
\end{tikzpicture}
};


(left: without scaling, right: with scaling)

• Nesting tikzpictures is not recommended. – CarLaTeX Oct 29 '17 at 8:16
• More context might be useful why this is not recommended: tex.stackexchange.com/a/46792/16352 – Thomas Rebele Oct 29 '17 at 9:09
• I had an internal node that I was able to scale (rather than scaling the whole picture) - so this answer was helpful to me! – user3486184 Oct 29 '17 at 22:22