I doubt that making a table look gaudy -- say, by assigning dominant, bright colors to the table cells -- actually makes the table more readable, as opposed to just making it stand out visually. Providing more structure to the header material and providing some kind of visual rhythm to the body of the table should be at least as successful.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{booktabs,siunitx}
\sisetup{output-decimal-marker={,}}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{MAE for 48 irradiance transposition pathways}
\label{tab:MAE results}
\begin{tabular}{@{} l *{3}{S[table-format=2.2]} @{}}
\toprule
Decomposition & \multicolumn{3}{c@{}}{Transposition} \\
\cmidrule(l){2-4}
& {DIRINT} & {DISC} & {Erbs} \\
\midrule
Reindl & 8,11 & 16,79 & 21,79 \\
Hay \& Davies & 8,11 & 16,75 & 21,75 \\
P. Albuquerque 1988 & 8,33 & 17,39 & 23,34 \\
P. Phoenix 1988 & 8,34 & 17,39 & 23,22 \\
P. Sandia composite 1988& 8,39 & 17,38 & 23,16 \\ \addlinespace
King & 8,41 & 16,75 & 20,52 \\
P. Cape Canaveral 1988 & 8,50 & 17,55 & 22,53 \\
P. USA composite 1988 & 8,51 & 17,51 & 22,98 \\
P. Osage 1988 & 8,55 & 17,87 & 24,03 \\
P. All sites composite 1990&8,58 & 17,61 & 22,79 \\ \addlinespace
Isotropic sky & 8,59 & 16,20 & 20,70 \\
P. Albany 1988 & 8,65 & 17,54 & 22,72 \\
P. Elmonte 1988 & 8,65 & 17,61 & 23,26 \\
P. All sites composite 1988&8,74 & 17,79 & 23,06 \\
P. France 1988 & 9,23 & 18,17 & 23,02 \\ \addlinespace
Klucher & 10,38 & 20,02 & 23,53 \\
\midrule
\multicolumn{1}{r}{Column averages}
& 8,63 & 17,52 & 22,65 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\end{document}
siunitx
and dropbackslashbox
in favour of a construction with two rows: gist.github.com/moewew/ce41bdc02b56d217baec6237e662dbc1