2

The following code works as I was expecting but it generates an error. How to remove the it

\documentclass[a4paper,openright,twoside]{book}
\usepackage[latin9]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[svgnames]{pstricks}
\usepackage{pst-node,pst-blur}

\begin{document}

\psblurbox[fillstyle=solid, fillcolor=gray!10,linestyle=none]{\begin{tabular}{l}

Soit une $(n-)$\textit{boucle} {\rnode{A}{$J_0$} {\protect$\rightarrow~\cdots~\rightarrow$~\rnode{B}{$J_{n-1}$}%
\ncarc[linewidth=.5pt,node sep=5pt, offset=3pt]{->}{B}{A}}}, alors il existe \\un point fixe $p$ de $f^n$ tel que $f^i(p) \in J_i$ pour $0\leq i < n$.
\end{tabular}}
\end{center}
\end{document}
1

Use strokeopacity to make the expoenent i more readable:

\documentclass{book}
\usepackage[svgnames]{pstricks}
\usepackage{pst-node,pst-blur}

\begin{document}
\begin{center}
\psblurbox[fillcolor=gray!10,linestyle=none]{\parbox{0.7\linewidth}{%
    Soit une $(n-)$\textit{boucle} \rnode{A}{$J_0$} 
    $\rightarrow~\cdots~\rightarrow$~\rnode{B}{$J_{n-1}$}%
    \ncarc[linewidth=.5pt,offset=3pt,strokeopacity=0.5]{->}{B}{A}, alors il existe 
    un point fixe $p$ de $f^n$ tel que $f^i(p) \in J_i$ pour $0\leq 
    i < n$.%
}}
\end{center}
\end{document}

enter image description here

3

node sep is the culprit. And you forgot a \begin{center}.

\documentclass[a4paper,openright,twoside]{book}
\usepackage[latin9]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[svgnames]{pstricks}
\usepackage{pst-node,pst-blur}

\begin{document}
\begin{center}
\psblurbox[fillstyle=solid, fillcolor=gray!10,linestyle=none]{\begin{tabular}{l}

Soit une $(n-)$\textit{boucle} {\rnode{A}{$J_0$} {\protect$\rightarrow~\cdots~\rightarrow$~\rnode{B}{$J_{n-1}$}%
\ncarc[linewidth=.5pt,offset=3pt]{->}{B}{A}}}, alors il existe \\un point fixe $p$ de $f^n$ tel que $f^i(p) \in J_i$ pour $0\leq i < n$.
\end{tabular}}
\end{center}
\end{document}

enter image description here

7
  • Thanks marmot. I wonder why nodesep doesn't work. Jun 25 '18 at 18:40
  • @cyrille.piatecki Very simple: node sep is TikZ syntax, for PSTricks use nodesep, so no separation between node and sep ;-) But you were saying you were fine with the output so I just dropped it.
    – user121799
    Jun 25 '18 at 18:48
  • marmot. Obviously, I have not seen the space I introduced in nodesep. It was a pure error of mine. I apologized. I use pstricks now since 20 years and I made again and again stupid error. I recognize that this post may be not very usefull to others. Nevertheless thanks again. Jun 27 '18 at 18:34
  • @cyrille.piatecki Strange logic but of course you are the boss. ;-) (What if someone would post a TikZ pic which as an even nicer output?)
    – user121799
    Jun 27 '18 at 18:36
  • 1
    @cyrille.piatecki I think you should ask a new question then. The answers are not just for you, but for everyone. Imagine you have a problem, find a question on it, but the answer is on something else. That's why I am not 100% happy with how things went here. I do not care about the reputation, but about providing appropriate answers on questions such that other might find question and answer useful.
    – user121799
    Jun 28 '18 at 4:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.