# How do I disable ligatures?

I am writing my dissertation in LaTeX I am faced with this odd situation that if 'f' character has another character (f, i or l) next to it, it sticks the two together as can be noted below. This makes the two 'f' look different.

How can I disable this?

• This is called ligature. It is a common procedure. Don't worry and be happy. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typographic_ligature Jul 7, 2018 at 13:45
• If you really want (I don't recommend) you can type Di{f}{f}erent Jul 7, 2018 at 13:47
• if you look at any printed works for the last few hundred years you will see ff ligatures, it would look more odd if you force the separate f Jul 7, 2018 at 14:01
• Don't suppress ligatures! It is a feature of superior typography. Jul 7, 2018 at 15:56
• Somehow what the other comments fail to acknowledge is that this is a terrible ligature. The default font unfortunately has these flaws. A fix is therefore to use a better font. Jul 7, 2018 at 22:39

Ligatures are generally considered a good thing, but if you really want to disable them and are using pdfLaTeX (or LuaLaTeX), the microtype package can do this for you. If you load this package and add \DisableLigatures{encoding = *, family = * } to your preamble, all ligatures will disappear from your output.

Here's an example (pdfLaTeX only):

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{microtype}
\DisableLigatures{encoding = *, family = *}
% \DisableLigatures[f]{encoding = *, family = *} %% <- only disables f-ligatures

\begin{document}

Different -- without ligatures!

\end{document}


Note that the double hyphen (--), which is normally typeset as a single en dash, is also treated as a ligature by TeX and that this is suppressed as well. The standard set of ligatures that TeX recognises consists of:

Actual ligatures: ff → ﬀ     fi → ﬁ     fl → ﬂ     ffi → ﬃ    ffl → ﬄ
"Fake" ligatures: -- → –    --- → —      → “      ’’ → ”      ! → ¡     ? → ¿


You can use \DisableLigatures[f]{encoding = *, family = * } to only disable ligatures that start with the letter f (i.e., the entire top row).

The microtype package actually does a lot more than this. It implements a number of micro-typographical features that generally improve the layout of your paragraphs. (See the documentation for more information.)

To make this work with LuaLaTeX you need to also use the fontspec package and supply the Renderer=Basic option while loading your font. For LuaLaTeX, Mico's answer is therefore preferable.

• Can you turn them back on again, after the title? Jul 7, 2018 at 16:18
• No, I'm afraid not. You could with @Mico's answer though, but you'd have to switch to LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX for that. For example, {\addfontfeature{Ligatures=NoCommon}off} off prints "off" twice: once without ligatures and once with. Jul 7, 2018 at 16:28
• -- is not a ligature; it's a digraph comprised of two ASCII characters representing the non-ASCII en dash. Jul 7, 2018 at 20:54
• @chepner It is a ligature as far as TeX is considered. That is, this is how it is coded. Of course, you are correct in the non-TeXnical sense of 'ligature'.
– cfr
Jul 7, 2018 at 23:18
• @chepner You're right, I've modified my answer to clarify this. Jul 8, 2018 at 12:01

Lig­a­tures were in­vented to solve a prac­ti­cal type­set­ting prob­lem. In the days of metal fonts, cer­tain char­ac­ters had fea­tures that phys­i­cally col­lided with other char­ac­ters. To fix this, font mak­ers in­cluded lig­a­tures with their fonts, which com­bined the trou­ble­some let­ters into one piece of type.

These are the examples:

However, not all fonts have the ff ligature with both letters fused, so if you do not like them, the best that you can do is to choose another font. In the Latex font catalogue every font has a section Ligatures and German double s, where you can see how they will be displayed.

For instance:

Font without ligatures:

Letter Gothic

Note: I do not know an easy way to find a font without ligatures, we open it and look for absence of the Ligature section.

• Maybe you can add a comparison of ligature vs no ligature in Computer/Latin modern (bold/normal). For bold I think the fi ligature is necessary, but the ff might be more debatable. Jul 7, 2018 at 15:30

Ligatures are a feature of superior typography!

However, there are cases where good typography indeed calls for suppressing them, especially in German texts: at word-seams (German: Wortfuge).

With package babel and the ngerman option, ligatures are suppressed using "|

For example Auf"|lage, auf"|finden, auf"|fangen, schlaf"|los.

As stated in Mico's comment a number of English words also call for suppressing f ligatures. Here, this is accomplished through \/:

shelf\/ful, self\/less, half\/line, ...

But again, keep ligatures in different, affordable etc.

• +1. I fully agree with you that (a) ligatures are a feature of superior typography and (b) there are cases when ligatures should be suppressed. However, the OP's example -- the word "different" -- is not among these cases; it may be worth stating this fact explicitly, lest there be any confusion among readers as to whether the ff ligature in different is somehow inappropriate. Incidentally, if you wanted to give examples of English language words for which f-ligatures should be suppressed, you could mention shelfful, selfless, halfline, wolffish (yes, there is such a thing), and chaffinch.
– Mico
Jul 7, 2018 at 16:21
• Thank you. I edited the answer. Is \/ the correct means of suppressing ligatures? Jul 7, 2018 at 16:30
• Indeed, \/ is one possible way for suppressing ligatures, but it's not necessarily the best way. Other methods are inserting \kern0pt or {}. (However, the {}method does not work under Lua(La)TeX, and it doesn't even work always under pdf(La)TeX.) Aside: All of these methods have as a side-effect that hyphenation is no longer possible at the indicated ligature suppression points. A package (LuaLaTeX-only) that performs selective ligature suppression is selnolig. Full disclosure: I'm the main author and maintainer of this package.
– Mico
Jul 7, 2018 at 16:48
• Invented technical words may need a ligature suppressed: pdfid meaning the id number of a pdf tends to be mispronounced pee dee fid, without pdf\/id. Mar 28, 2019 at 20:04

If you absolutely must suppress ligatures (not a good idea, but since you insist...) and if you happen to use either XeLaTeX or LuaLaTeX to compile your LaTeX document, you could achieve your typesetting objective by specifying the option Ligatures=NoCommon while executing \setmainfont, \setsansfont, etc. Alternatively, run \defaultfontfeatures{Ligatures=NoCommon} before running \setmainfont and \setsansfont.

Aside: This method will not keep -- and --- from being made into en-dashes and em-dashes, respectively.

A final comment: Do learn not to only tolerate, but to actually appreciate and like typographic ligatures. They're your friends -- typographically speaking.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\defaultfontfeatures{Ligatures=NoCommon}
\setmainfont{Latin Modern Roman}
\newcommand\blurb{off fit fly office baffle}
\begin{document}
\blurb

\textbf{\blurb}

\sffamily
\blurb

\textbf{\blurb}
\end{document}

• Much as I like the visual aspect of ligatures, there aren't your friend in the digital world. My thesis was set in (pdf)LaTeX with default ligatures. But use is inconsistent. The 'ff' ligature is used in headings but not the ToC. Copying/exporting to plain-text (for ML/AI use) the monospaced fonts used in output generally have no ligature glyph. Thus 'office' exports as 'oce' and 'proffessor' as 'proessor'. So, in today's world, unless only targetting paper or un-remediated use. So if using plain-text from LaTeX PDFs for AI/ML, take care!
– mwra
Oct 28, 2021 at 14:37
• @mwra - I suppose all kinds of things -- and not just ligatures -- are quaint and maybe even obsolete "in the digital world". However, assuming one has compiled a LaTeX document properly, i.e., not via the hide-bound tex-dvi-ps-pdf route, I don't agree with your claim that one cannot successfully copy and paste text that contains ligated letters from a pdf file to a plain-text file, say, for AI/ML purposes. For sure, I do such copy and paste operations regularly (from LaTeX documents I've compiled myself), and I have yet to encounter this problem. Maybe I'm just lucky...
– Mico
Oct 28, 2021 at 18:07
• I think you are 'just lucky'. Most LaTeX users I encountered in recent post-grad/doc work had little expertise/interest in LaTeX being something they are made to use, i.e. it working properly is up to someone else. Working with text stripped for PDFs, it is a problem (discussing data cleaning seems taboo as so many people don't!). AFACT, problem arises as PDF was originally for digitally capturing and preserving print [sic] layout. Providing clean un-styled text likely wasn't even thought about - I don't it anywahererecall in Adobe Acrobat certification training.
– mwra
Oct 29, 2021 at 13:01
• @mwra I don't recommend spelling professor as proffessor, ligatures or not ^^ Beyond that, your problem is broader than ligatures: you're looking for tagged PDFs, which no LaTeX compiler currently has proper support for, unfortunately tex.stackexchange.com/questions/261537/… Nov 28, 2021 at 19:18
• @Clément. Hah, a typo—sadly one of several I can't now fix (dyslexia/dyspraxia are a daily issue). But whilst 'proffessor' is —in English—a typo it nonetheless still shows the ligature issue, which was the main point in case you misunderstood the comment. I've since found another nasty disconnect. If I take heading from the ToC, the ToC listings don't use ligatures whilst the body copy heading do. More inconsistency. Then again, PDFs & Postscript were intended as accurate digital paper, not digital text.
– mwra
Nov 30, 2021 at 15:39