5

I use the font times and I am writing powers of ten often. So I am using 10\textsuperscript{2}. I was wondering if it is possible to make a command like \ten{2} which does the same thing? It would make it faster for me to type and is also very clear to read in my editor. 

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{times}
\begin{document}
10\textsuperscript{2}
%\ten{2}
\end{document}
Improve this question
1
  • 1
    Off-topic: times is deprecated and ought not be used.
    – cfr
    Jul 9, 2018 at 0:44

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
4 
\documentclass{article}
\newcommand{\ten}[1]{10\textsuperscript{#1}}
\usepackage{blindtext,times}
\begin{document}
    \ten{2}\blindtext\par\ten{324}
\end{document}
Improve this answer
1
  • 1
    Please could you edit your code to make it compilable?
    – cfr
    Jul 9, 2018 at 0:45
15

Perhaps a more versatile solution:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{siunitx}
\begin{document}
    \num{e2}

    \num{1e5}
\end{document}

gives

enter image description here

Improve this answer
7
  • Would not be very clear for the editor reading it, though. Also, doesn't this give you a bad box warning?
    – cfr
    Jul 9, 2018 at 0:45
  • @cfr Do you mean the code or the output not being clear for the editor? I don't quite understand: if you mean editor (of a journal, say) or the TeX editor, or..? And no, it doesn't. It does for you?
    – Troy
    Jul 9, 2018 at 0:49
  • I thought part of the point was to make the source more readable for the editor. That's what the question said was part of the motivation for \ten{#1}. And I didn't check yet. Shouldn't it give a bad box warning, though?
    – cfr
    Jul 9, 2018 at 0:51
  • @cfr oh ok, so the editor as mentioned in the question, i.e., the TeX editor. Whether it's more readable seems to be in the eye of the beholder IMO. I don't find this any harder to read than \ten{2}, say. But it's more versatile, and has the benefit of being a more well-known command. In either case, it's better than \textsuperscript which is the main problem posed by OP. With regards to bad box, I don't know.. It doesn't for me. You mean the bad box to come from using `\\`?
    – Troy
    Jul 9, 2018 at 0:55
  • I agree it is more versatile. And, yes, shouldn't that give a bad box warning? Now I can't produce a bad box warning using \\ at all. (I.e. no matter how hard I try.]
    – cfr
    Jul 9, 2018 at 1:02
1

If you use knitr, just write a \Sexpr{}:

<<echo=F>>=
options(scipen=-3)
@
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\Sexpr{10^2} \Sexpr{10^5} \Sexpr{10000} \Sexpr{100} \Sexpr{0.0000123}
\end{document}

mwe

Improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.