Another solution, also provided by the mathtools
package, is to use its \smashoperator
macro. In fact, by writing \smashoperator[r]{...}
, one can arrange that the material overlaps only on the right, rather than on both sides. (Observe that the word "Note" does not overlap with the material below the summation sign.)
Note that I would also create a macro, called (say) \VaR
, to typeset the string VaR
with upright letters. And, do note that there's no point in encasing P(X)\cdot x
in curly braces.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\newcommand\VaR{\mathrm{VaR}}
\begin{document}
\begin{equation}
\text{Note:}\smashoperator[r]{\sum_{X\leq\VaR_\alpha(X)}} P(X)\cdot x
\end{equation}
\end{document}
Addendum to address the OP's follow-up question: You may achieve your typesetting objective by (a) switching to the basic, i.e., centered version of the \smashoperator
directive and inserting a suitable "kern" at the start of the subscript material. I know it's not fruitful to argue about tastes, but in my opinion the result of right-shifting the subscript material is anything but good-looking.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\newcommand\VaR{\mathrm{VaR}}
\begin{document}
\[
\text{Note:}\smashoperator{\sum_{\mkern70mu X\leq\VaR_\alpha(X)}} P(X)\cdot x
\]
\end{document}