I've come across this in a book I'm looking through, but I can't find the code for it. I want it to look exactly like the \widehat and go above text like \widehat does...I just want it to be (vertically) flipped!


3 Answers 3


The symbol you are looking for is widecheck and can be found in the mathabx font package. Please consult pages 10 and 16 of the mathabx user manual. The syntax is \widecheck{xyz}.

Here is a minimum working example to demonstrate:

enter image description here

$\widecheck{\theta\tilde\theta} + \widecheck{\phi^2-\rho}$

The second example compares the behavior of \hat, \widehat, \check, and \widecheck.

enter image description here

& \textbf{narrow} & \textbf{wide} \\
\textbf{hat} & $\hat{I}+\hat{II}+\hat{III}+\hat{IIII}$ & $\widehat{I}+\widehat{II}+\widehat{III}+\widehat{IIII}$\\
\textbf{check} & $\check{I}+\check{II}+\check{III}+\check{IIII}$ & $\widecheck{I}+\widecheck{II}+\widecheck{III}+\widecheck{IIII}$\\

To install the mathabx font package, one of the following may work:

  1. If you are using Debian/Ubuntu, simply run sudo apt-get install texlive-fonts-extra texlive-fonts-extra-doc.
  2. If you have a new version of TexLive, then something like sudo tlmgr update --self followed by tlmgr install mathabx should work (I haven't tested this because I do not have tlmgr).
  • 3
    +1 very elaborate answer. I think that "widecheck" would have been sufficient:o) Commented Feb 12, 2012 at 8:34
  • @user001 - WOW. What a thorough and helpful response. Thanks so much; that's exactly what I needed! Commented Feb 12, 2012 at 17:38
  • 2
    \usepackage{mathabx} makes certain symbols look weird, not standard (e.g. \infty becomes a rotated unsymmetric number 8; \in has three different length lines etc). Commented Jan 30, 2020 at 12:19

while the answer by @user001 is correct in that \widecheck is supported by the mathabx fonts and package, that package/font collection also changes the shapes of a lot of (most) other symbols. if you want to avoid such "extra" changes, you can load just the symbol(s) you want as shown in this example.


%% code from mathabx.sty and mathabx.dcl
      <5> <6> <7> <8> <9> <10>
      <10.95> <12> <14.4> <17.28> <20.74> <24.88>



A wide check should match a wide hat, but inverted.  Observe that
the forms provided have a maximum width.  Some other wide accents
in \verb|mathx| aren't available otherwise.
\cs{widehat}:\quad & \widehat{A}\quad\widehat{AB}\quad
\cs{widecheck}:\quad & \widecheck{A}\quad\widecheck{AB}\quad
\cs{wideparen}:\quad & \wideparen{A}\quad\wideparen{AB}\quad


note: this demonstration was created long ago for use in ams publications, hence the extra unrelated code; however, the technique of using the verbatim package to generate a list of the example file in the output, using \verbatiminput, has proved very useful here, and may do so for others, so i haven't removed it.

  • Works but add an error only with the beamer class in my case: Too many math alphabets used in version normal. It seems like there is a limitation of 16 math alphabets (see this answer).
    – remjg
    Commented May 14, 2014 at 15:16


I copied the following code from someone a long time ago. I don't understand it, but it also seems to produce wide checks in math mode.


    \@tempdima\ht\z@ \advance\@tempdima2\ht\tw@ \divide\@tempdima\thr@@
    {\ooalign{\box\tw@ \cr \box\z@}}}

Output and comparison

Here is the output with different font sizes and a comparison with the \widecheck{} command from the mathabx package:

widecheck output and comparison

  • 7
    I dont understand it either, so it must be good
    – nicolas
    Commented Feb 15, 2017 at 21:37
  • It seems that only \scalebox is used from the mathtools package, and it is actually from the graphicx package.
    – user87690
    Commented Jul 8, 2017 at 13:11
  • 2
    Unfortunately, exponents end up in the wrong place with this code. Compare \widecheck{y}^2 with this code and mathabx...
    – Dominique
    Commented Jul 15, 2018 at 0:22
  • @Dominique Good point! Commented Jul 16, 2018 at 17:13

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .