1

Something quite strange. Why I have as a result of the following formula:

\begin{equation}
\omega=\lambda_{1}\Sigma^{-1}\bf{1}+\lambda_{2}\Sigma^{-1}\mu
\end{equation}

a black square instead the sigma symbol? in the first part is ok. I am becoming a bit crazy trying to find out the error. I tried everything, to separate, to isolate, to write the formula with double $$ rather than \begin{equation}, packages loaded are the normal ones, etc... Any other symbol works perfectly but with \Sigma is quite weird, this is what I got no matter the way you try to write the formula.

enter image description here

Thanks for your support!

  • 9
    \bf should never be used in latex but if you do use it the syntax would be {\bf 1} but use \mathbf{1} – David Carlisle Jul 23 '18 at 11:20
  • 5
    Your usage of \bf{} is wrong, it should be \mathbf{}. A long time ago in a galaxy far far away it should have been {\bf }, but not any more. I suspect what's happened is now everything after \bf is in the bold font and \Sigma's place in the bold font encoding is taken by the square – Au101 Jul 23 '18 at 11:22
  • You're right. My fault. Sorry for the inconvenience :( – José Jul 23 '18 at 14:43
  • @José No need to apologise - not an inconvenience - it's always good to be able to correct these errors which are easy to make :) – Au101 Jul 23 '18 at 15:31
4

Using this code:

\begin{equation}
\omega=\lambda_{1}\Sigma^{-1} \mathbf{1}+\lambda_{2}\Sigma^{-1}\mu
\end{equation}

returns this output:

correct output for equation

Only the \bf command was exchanged with \mathbf.

  • Bufff!!! Yes, I admit it. Big mistake. My fault given that I am not so newcomer to latex as it could be ;) Sorry for the inconvenience. – José Jul 23 '18 at 14:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.