I am trying to TeX the following schematic:

enter image description here

using some fiddling around with multirows. However, everything's messed up, so I suppose there must be a more elegant way. How? So far, my attempts using blkarray also do not work out quite well…


Here is a proposal using a combination of array and matrix. I've reduced the vertical space between lines using, for example, [-1.3em]. Also reduced the space between the contents and large outside brackets using \mkern-8mu, for example. You can change these numbers as you see fit. Adjustments to the column separation can be made using \arraycolsep.

enter image description here



\[ \arraycolsep=3pt
& & & \begin{matrix} a\\b \end{matrix} \\[-1.3em]
& & \left( \begin{matrix} e\\f \end{matrix} \middle/ \begin{matrix} c\\d \end{matrix} \right) & \\[-1em]
& g & & \\[-1.3em]
\left( \begin{matrix} j\\k \end{matrix} \middle/ \begin{matrix} h\\i \end{matrix} \right) & & &

  • This is really cool! I think it is even a bit handier if one puts the lonesome $g$ into a dummy matrix. Did you get the 1.3em just by trying, or is there a deeper reason? – Bubaya Jul 25 '18 at 10:51
  • No deep reason. I started off by putting [-1em] after each line break. And just adjusted them from there. – Milo Jul 25 '18 at 11:07
  • By the way, I'm curious, what does the word solidusses mean?? – Milo Jul 25 '18 at 11:09
  • Unicode uses the name solidus it to refer to a slash. Since I am unaware of Latin, I do not know the proper plural form. ~~Solidūs?~~ Solidi, according to Wikipedia – Bubaya Jul 25 '18 at 12:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.