After the last software update by means of TeX Live Utility, about a week ago, I had this strange problem that I cannot solve because I don't remember the updated packages so I don't know where exactely go to search. The preamble of the MWE is the one that has always worked for both my current job as well for the previous ones. The problem is related to footnotes in the reledmac environment and to highlight it I have set three types of notes: 1. normal footnote, which never causes the error. 2. familiar footnote and critical footnote, both causing it.
The problem manifests itself with a typesetting phase that never ends, a sort of loop.
\documentclass[a4paper,twoside,openright,11pt]{memoir}
\usepackage{soul}
\usepackage{morewrites}
\usepackage{adjustbox}
\usepackage{clipboard}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{shapes}
\usetikzlibrary{decorations.text,positioning,decorations.markings}
\usepackage{ragged2e}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[]{pstricks}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage[retainmissing]{MnSymbol}
\usepackage[strict=true,italian=quotes,maxlevel=2]{csquotes}
\usepackage{pifont}
\usepackage{stmaryrd}
\usepackage{bbding}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{adforn}
\setsecnumdepth{chapter}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{6}
\usepackage{scrextend}
\usepackage{psvectorian}
\usepackage{hhline}
\usepackage{tablefootnote}
\usepackage{pgfplots}
\usetikzlibrary{svg.path}
\usepackage[series={A,B},noledgroup,noend]{reledmac}
\usepackage{reledpar}
\setgoalfraction{.98}
\setRlineflag{b}
\linespread{1}
\setlength{\Lcolwidth}{.49\textwidth}
\setlength{\Rcolwidth}{.49\textwidth}
\columnsposition{C}
\AtEveryPend{\vspace{5pt}}
\AtBeginPairs{\sloppy}
\usepackage{polyglossia}
\usepackage{babel}
\setdefaultlanguage{english}
\setotherlanguage{french}
\setotherlanguage{hebrew}
\setmainfont{PT Serif}[Scale=1]
\selectfont
\setsansfont{Arial}[Scale=1]
\newfontfamily\hebrewfont{SBL Hebrew}[Scale=1]
\usepackage{bidi}
\settypeblocksize{210.34mm}{135mm}{*}
\setlrmargins{30mm}{*}{1.4142}
\setulmargins{30mm}{*}{1.4142}
\setheadfoot{5mm}{15mm}
\setmarginnotes{2mm}{30mm}{1.5mm}
\renewcommand*{\sidefootform}{}
\checkandfixthelayout
\begin{document}
As any {dedicated}{{dedicato}} reader can clearly see, the Ideal of
practical reason is a representation of, as far as I know, the things
in themselves; as I have shown elsewhere, the phenomena should only be
used as a canon for our understanding. As will easily be shown in the next section, reason would
thereby be made to contradict, in view of these considerations, the
Ideal of practical reason, yet the manifold depends on the phenomena.\footnote{normal footnote}
\begin{pairs}
\begin{Leftside}
\beginnumbering
\pstart
The paralogisms of practical
reason are what first give rise to the architectonic of practical
reason. As will easily be shown in the next section, reason would
thereby be made to contradict, in view of these considerations, the
Ideal of practical reason, yet the manifold depends on the phenomena.%\footnoteA{familiar footnote}
\edtext{prova}{\Afootnote[nosep]{critical footnote}}
\pend
\pstart
\begin{otherlanguage}{hebrew}
\texthebrew{אבג דהו זחט יכל מנס עפצ פרש ת}
\end{otherlanguage}
\pend
\pstart
Hume tells us that the transcendental unity of
apperception can not take account of the discipline of natural reason,
by means of analytic unity. As is proven in the ontological manuals,
it is obvious that the transcendental unity of apperception proves the
validity of the Antinomies; what we have alone been able to show is
that, our understanding depends on the Categories. It remains a
mystery why the Ideal stands in need of reason.
\pend
\endnumbering
\end{Leftside}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{Rightside}
\beginnumbering
\pstart
Our concepts have lying before them the
paralogisms of natural reason, but our a posteriori concepts have
lying before them the practical employment of our experience. Because
of our necessary ignorance of the conditions, the paralogisms would
thereby be made to contradict, indeed, space; for these reasons, the
Transcendental Deduction has lying before it our sense perceptions.
\pend
\pstart
Because of our necessary ignorance
of the conditions, it must not be supposed that, then, formal logic
(and what we have alone been able to show is that this is true) is a
representation of the never-ending regress in the series of empirical
conditions, but the discipline of pure reason, in so far as this
expounds the contradictory rules of metaphysics, depends on the
Antinomies.
\pend
\pstart
\begin{otherlanguage}{hebrew}
\texthebrew{אבג דהו זחט יכל מנס עפצ פרש ת}
\end{otherlanguage}
\pend
\endnumbering
\end{Rightside}
\end{pairs}
\Columns
\end{document}
