enter image description here \documentclass{article} \usepackage{circuitikz} \usetikzlibrary{positioning}


  \begin{circuitikz}[node distance = 8mm and 16mm]
\draw (0,0) node (nmos1) [nmos, xscale=-1, label=left:M1]  {}
            node (nmos2) [nmos,right=of nmos1,label=right:M2] {};
  • 1
    Welcome to TeX.SE! Could you perhaps consider adding a sketch of what you want to achieve? (I guess you're not just looking for a simple scale=0.7, are you?)
    – user121799
    Commented Oct 31, 2018 at 0:11
  • The reason I want to remove these source drain wires is because I am using nmos as a capacitor and I do not require these long wires. Commented Oct 31, 2018 at 19:01
  • So why don't you just use a capacitor symbol? Functionally, that is what it is, even if it was intended for something else. Commented Nov 3, 2018 at 14:13
  • Implementing as a MOS in to convey the circuit choice made. The actual capacitor is a combination of metal capacitors and MOS devices and that is the picture I am trying to make. Commented Nov 4, 2018 at 20:28

1 Answer 1


For formatting purposes, I am entering this as an answer. The following are the (adjustable) default setting for nmos.

\ctikzset{tripoles/nmos/gate height=.35}
\ctikzset{tripoles/nmos/base height=.5}
\ctikzset{tripoles/nmos/conn height=0}
\ctikzset{tripoles/nmos/base width=.5}
\ctikzset{tripoles/nmos/gate width=.62}
\ctikzset{tripoles/nmos/bodydiode scale=.3}
\ctikzset{tripoles/nmos/bodydiode distance=.3}
\ctikzset{tripoles/nmos/bodydiode conn=.6}
\ctikzset{tripoles/nmos/curr direction=1}

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .