I would like to know if there exist a bibliography style or if there is a easy way to generate a bibliography that looks like:

enter image description here

  • 1
    Bibliographies like the one shown are certainly very rare (almost non-existent) in scholarly works. For starters, the table does not contain the usual minimal information for a bibliography (which would also include year and at least one of publisher and location; for @articles you would definitely the journal and volume etc.) Secondly, most bibliographies in TeX don't use tables, instead they use lists. – moewe Nov 16 '18 at 6:45
  • 1
    Welcome to TeX.SE! Start from this: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/332710/… and edit your post adding a minimal working example with bibliography (MWEB). – CarLaTeX Nov 16 '18 at 6:46
  • 6
    My personal advice: don't do it. It is very ugly. – Johannes_B Nov 16 '18 at 7:02
  • 1
    @Johannes_B and moewe: I don't like that kind of bibliography style either, but it is a requirement. Sincerely I would done it in another way too. – pin_ftv Nov 16 '18 at 7:16
  • @CarLaTeX I didn't find any minimal working example while googling so I thought it makes no sense to add a working example of some other bibliography style that doesn't match at all that what I need. Instead I tried to put a graphic so that it will be clearer. Thank you all! – pin_ftv Nov 16 '18 at 7:16

With biblatex-ext's package biblatex-ext-tabular you can create tabular bibliographies like the ones in tabular bibliography with biblatex, in fact the code is largely inspired by Audrey's work in that question. You will need at least version 0.5 of biblatex-ext and you can read more about tabular bibliographies in §6 Tabular Bibliographies of its documentation.

For a simple three-column set-up with label, title and author you don't need a lot of code. But you should be aware of the fact that this information alone is not always enough to properly identify a work. @collections don't have authors, they have editors. Even @books usually have more information in the bibliography than just the title and author: the year of publication is present in almost all styles and at least one of publisher or location is very common. @articles would generally need at least a journal and a publication date. The situation is worse for other contained works like @incollection which may be next to impossible to find without knowing the enclosing work.

Not only does this not look very pretty, it is almost certainly not enough information for a proper bibliography. – Don't do this.


\usepackage[style=numeric, backend=biber]{biblatex}



     \textbf{Ref.} & \textbf{Title} & \textbf{Author}\\
   & \plainlang{\usebibmacro{title}}
   & \plainlang{\printnames{author}} \\}



Tabular bibliography with label number, title and author.

Compare this with the usual output of a numeric bibliography. If you want to put additional emphasis on the author name, you can make it bold.


\usepackage[style=numeric, backend=biber]{biblatex}





Usual list bibliography with bold author names so they stand out more.

  • thank you!! that's what I was looking for but unfortunately I couldn't find any reference to that package while googling. – pin_ftv Nov 16 '18 at 7:18
  • 1
    @pin_ftv It is still fairly new. – moewe Nov 16 '18 at 7:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.