Like the title says. I have supranotes=true in the options for the package. I have two footnotes (made with \footcite{}) with another footnote in between so I don't just get "ibid". But still the footnote is printed with the usual information, no "supra". The biblatex-chicago manual says "you’ll only see it in certain sorts of citation, automatically controlled by biblatex-chicago in accordance with the Bluebook specification". What kind of citations are these?

  • Which style do you use? notes or authordate?
    – moewe
    Nov 22 '18 at 19:07
  • @moewe, as far as I could gr[e|as]p both styles use the supra facilities, but in not precisely identical ways.
    – gusbrs
    Nov 22 '18 at 19:09

Checking the sources of biblatex-chicago we find supra related content in the bibmacros cite:short:legislation, cite:short:legal and cite:shorthand:legal which are applied to their respective entrytypes: legislation and legal.

  • 1
    That makes sense since the Bluebook is a style guide for legal citations and the CMS defers to the Bluebook when it comes to citations of case law and legislations.
    – moewe
    Nov 22 '18 at 19:06
  • Oh, I see. I only tried for the @book and @article bibliography entry types so that's why it doesn't work. But I think it's correct to use supra for anything. I've seen other authors in law use it for articles for example. Do you know if I can expand it to work for other entry types?
    – user.S
    Nov 22 '18 at 21:42
  • @user.S What is "correct" or "incorrect" is a matter of standard, and biblatex-chicago tries to follow the Chicago Manual of Style.
    – gusbrs
    Nov 22 '18 at 22:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.