\begin{align*}
\sum_{j=1}^{m_0-1}\,(-1)^{j-1}\hspace{-3ex}
\sum_{\substack{ k_{m_0 +1} \leq k_{m_0} \leq \cdots \leq k_{j+2} \leq k_1 \leq \boldsymbol{\ell} \\ k_2 < \cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} \leq k_1 }}
= \sum_{ k_{m_0 +1} \leq k_{m_0} \leq \cdots \leq k_2 \leq k_1 \leq
\boldsymbol{\ell}, } \tag(3) \label{eq:3}
\end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation \eqref{eq:2}.
Comparing equation \eqref{eq:3} with equation \eqref{eq:2}, we discover that both have the identical 1\ts{st} through $(m_0 -2)$\ts{th} terms ($1 \leq j \leq m_0-2$).
The only difference of the two is that the $(m_0 -1)$\ts{th} term in equation \eqref{eq:3} is ...
\end{document}
I try to put a tag next to the equation, but the result comes out as:
The tag is not displayed correctly. Also, the \eqref{eq:3}
are displayed in the same, wrong way. (I omit the code having eq:2
and eq:1
.)
\tag(3)
by\tag{3}
(curly brackets around3
). Otherwise LaTeX thinks you mean\tag{(}
.\boldsymbol{\ell}
out of the subscript, and not to abbreviate\textsuperscript
by\ts
if you ever plan to share your documents with others.