I'm writing a paper in LATEX, and based on the template the reference should be in order of their appearance in content. Which package should I use for it? Now this is what I'm using:


And the template file is like this:

Son, Y., Wysk, R., and Jones, A., 2003, \newblock ``Simulation Based Shop Floor     Control: Formal Model, Model Generation and Control Interface," \newblock
IIE Transactions on Design and Manufacturing, 35(1), 29-48.

  • Which one are you using bibtex or biblatex? Are you talking about \bibliographystyle{unsrt}? you can take a look at (amath.colorado.edu/documentation/LaTeX/reference/faq/…)
    – user11232
    Mar 4, 2012 at 23:16
  • @HarishKumar It's bibtex, but I don't have biblatex in the file type drop menu.
    – anna
    Mar 5, 2012 at 4:07

1 Answer 1


This example is from this site with a change in bibliography style.

The main file is like this:

\author{John Doe} \title{Sample Document}


According to the handbook of van Leunen~\cite{vanleunen},
this paragraph---and certainly this
section---should be longer than one sentence.

\section{More references}

Here we see if the reference~\cite{Narendra_1990}
to the Narendra article comes out OK, in particular,
with volume, number \& pages.

The necessary information for those who would use BibTeX
is available in the 1988 document of Prof.\ Patashnik~\cite{btxdoc}.
Interested readers who can read French may also
want to read Poussin's proof~\cite{primes}, though
it has nothing at all to do with BibTeX.


This is the concluding paragraph.  Here I cite another of
Oren Patashnik's books~\cite{btxhak} and, again,
van Leunen's and Poussin's~\cite{vanleunen,primes}.

\bibliographystyle{unsrt}   % (uses file "unsrt.bst")
\bibliography{myrefs}       % expects file "myrefs.bib"

Save this file as mydoc.tex (say). The reference file (.bib file) is

@string{jgr = "J.~Geophys.~Res."}

   author = "Charles Louis Xavier Joseph de la Vall{\'e}e Poussin",
   note = "A strong form of the prime number theorem, 19th century",
   year = 1879

   title = "The Chicago Manual of Style",
   publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
   edition = "Thirteenth",
   year = 1982,
   pages = "400--401",
   key = "Chicago"

   author = "Donald E. Knuth",
   title= "The {{\TeX}book}",
   publisher = "Addison-Wesley",
   year = 1984

   author = "Leslie Lamport",
   title = "{\LaTeX \rm:} {A} Document Preparation System",
   publisher = "Addison-Wesley",
   year = 1986

   author = "Oren Patashnik",
   title = "{Using BibTeX}",
   note = "Documentation for general BibTeX users",
   month = jan,
   year = 1988

   author = "Oren Patashnik",
   title = "Designing BibTeX Styles",
   note = "The part of BibTeX's documentation
                            that's not meant for general users",
   month = jan,
   year = 1988

   author = "Strunk, Jr., William and E. B. White",
   title = "The Elements of Style",
   publisher = "Macmillan",
   edition = "Third",
   year = 1979

   title = "A Handbook for Scholars",
   author = "Mary-Claire van Leunen",
   publisher = "Knopf",
   year = "1979"

   AUTHOR  = {Zurek, R. W. and Martin, L. J.},
   TITLE   = {Interannual Variability of planet-encircling dust activity on {M}ars},
   YEAR    = {1993},
   JOURNAL = jgr,
   VOLUME  = {98},
   NUMBER  = {E2},
   PAGES   = {3247--3259}

  author =       {K.S.Narendra and K.Parthsarathy},
  title =        {Identification and Control of Dynamical System
                  using Neural Networks},
  journal =      "IEENN",
  year =         {1990},
  volume =    {1},
  number =    {1},
  month =     {},
  pages =     {4-27},
  note =      {},
  annote =    {}

Save this file as myrefs.bib and put it in the same folder as mydoc.tex. Now you should run

  1. pdflatex
  2. bibtex
  3. pdflatex
  4. pdflatex

in this order.

For different styles have a look at this article.

  • I would strongly recommend using biblatex instead of bibtex. The latter is very unflexible, and exhibits strange behavior (for example with respect to capitalization in titles).
    – mbork
    Mar 4, 2012 at 23:43
  • @mbork Accepted. Some how bibtex is very rigid. But I do not have enough time now. It will be nice of you if you can get a MWE using biblatex.
    – user11232
    Mar 4, 2012 at 23:51
  • 2
    The only disadvantage of biblatex is that the journal to which paper is communicated should accept it with biblatex. Otherwise only bibtex is the choice. One can combine natbib with bibtex and manage without trouble.
    – user11232
    Mar 5, 2012 at 1:09
  • Thanks, I copied the files. It is working with these files but when I don't get how I should chage my tex.
    – anna
    Mar 5, 2012 at 4:06
  • @HarishKumar: well, the first moment I'll have some spare time will be probably around Friday... maybe I'll try to do it then (it won't be very easy since I have no experience with biblatex except for reading the manual; I use amsrefs instead, and AFAIK it does not have such functionality).
    – mbork
    Mar 5, 2012 at 6:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.