An example is a bit artificial, but the point is that I do not understand why
{} influence the outcome of \newcommand in the way described below.
Consider the following definition:
\newcommand\printit[1]{#1}
whose outcome is obvious. However, a small alteration:
\newcommand{\printit[1]}{#1}
and e.g. \printit{2} yields:
I have no idea why. Could you please shed some light on what is going on here?
If LaTeX was being written now,
\newcommand{\printit[1]}{#1}
would give an error message that \printit[1] was not a single token.
The correct syntax is
\newcommand{\printit}[1]{#1}
or
\newcommand\printit[1]{#1}
LaTeX does nothing special to allow both forms, it is just on the general TeX macro syntax rules that braces can be omitted if a macro argument is a single token.
If you pass two (or in this case, four) tokens to \newcommand then anything that happens is essentially just accidental behaviour, as the system could not really afford the space or time required to catch "unlikely" errors.
As to what happens,
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\newcommand{\printit[1]}{#1}
\show\printit
\expandafter\show\csname\string\printit\endcsname
\end{document}
produces the terminal log
> \printit=macro:
->\@protected@testopt \printit \\printit {0}.
l.7 \show\printit
?
> \\printit=\long macro:
[#1]->#1.
The command defines \printit to have an optional first argument, although the default value of 0 being supplied was intended as the default value for \newcommand itself.
it is what makes \newcommand\foo the same as \newcommand\foo[0] and define a command with no arguments.
The inner part of the command handling the optional argument is \\printit which just drops the square brackets.
So
\printit{2}
is
\printit[0]{2}
which is
0{2}
which typesets as 02
\usepackage{xparse} and replace \newcommand by \NewDocumentCommand and you get ! LaTeX3 Error: First argument of '\NewDocumentCommand' must be a command.
– David Carlisle
Jan 14 at 7:55
\def\new@command#1{% \@testopt{\@newcommand#1}0}from latex.ltx, i.e. LaTeX tests whether there is an optional argument in the first argument of\newcommand, i.e.\printit[1]and returns0, the{2}in its usage is not regarded as an argument. You could use\printitwithout{}and it will still print0, use it as\printit[2]and it will print2. In fact you have defined a macro with optional arguments in a non-obvious way – user31729 Jan 13 at 20:00\newcommand\printit[1]{#1}or\newcommand{\printit}[1]{#1}(The number of parameters to be expected is given in square brackets, outside of the{}). In case people come across this and are confused by the above syntax. – Peter Grill Jan 13 at 20:07