I find that $\tilde{x} produces a tilde that is much too small for legibility at the screen resolution I normally use for reading. On my screen it looks like a tiny bar above the symbol. This question asked how to generate a larger tilde over a particular wide character (a mathcal W), presumably with the motivation of making the tilde look better matched in size with this large glyph. The answer by Ant provides a couple of methods, which look good for wide characters but bad for narrow ones. Example:




$\tilde{W} \quad \tildea{W} \quad \tildeb{W}$

$\tilde{I} \quad \tildea{I} \quad \tildeb{I}$



rendered output of latex code

To me the larger tildes over the "I" look like they're way off in terms of horizontal positioning. Is there a way to make a macro that automagically gets this horizontal positioning right, as the \tilde macro seems to do? I would like to avoid having different macros for characters of different widths.

  • 5
    Perhaps \widetilde?
    – egreg
    Jan 22, 2019 at 16:31
  • @egreg: Thanks, I hadn't even noticed that possibility, which was mentioned in the linked question. I think that works well enough for my purposes. It does look kind of goofy on a character as wide as W, but I don't actually use it atop a W.
    – user6853
    Jan 22, 2019 at 17:40
  • or really really wide tilde tex.stackexchange.com/questions/63545/big-tilde-in-math-mode/… Jan 22, 2019 at 22:02

1 Answer 1


I can suggest to use the lite version of mtpro2 that you can find to CTAN. Here for example there is a recent documentation (see pag. 14). Is you will use this MWE


Let $\wwtilde{I}$ collision be elastic in one frame of reference.\\
Let $\tilde{I}$ and let $ \widetilde{I}$ another frame.


you will obtain this output.

enter image description here

The best tilde is with the command \wwtilde a good solution to center it with any letter. Personally I suggest to leave the same size (or dimension) of "tilde".

You must log in to answer this question.