2

I am trying to set up an intercorrelation table showing results of two samples. However, for better visuals, I want to split this table into two parts by adding a diagonal line through whole table (not only one cell). The cells themselves have different lengths.

I actually tried to use diagbox, but it failed, (afaik) because it's only intended to be applied at one cell only.

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{diagbox}

\begin{document}

\begin{tabular}{rrrrrr}
    \toprule \\[-1.8ex] 
    & AAAAA & BBBBBBBB & CCCCC & DDDDDD & EEEEEE \\ 
    \midrule
    A & \backslashbox && && \\ 
    B & .XX***  &  \backslashbox & &  & \\ 
    C & .XX***  & .XX***  & \backslashbox & & \\ 
    D & .XX***  & .XX***  & .XX***  & \backslashbox &\\ 
    E & .XX***  & .XX***  & .XX***  & .XX***  & \backslashbox \\ 
    \bottomrule
\end{tabular}

\end{document}

Any ideas - I checked existing answers but none seems to fit.

3

Here is a possibility with pstricks, if I've well understood what you want:

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{diagbox}
\usepackage{pst-node, auto-pst-pdf}

\begin{document}

\begin{postscript}
\begin{tabular}{rrrrrr}
    \toprule \\[-1.8ex]
    & AAAAA & BBBBBBBB & CCCCC & DDDDDD & EEEEEE \\
    \midrule
    A \pnode[1em, 2.6ex]{A} & && && \\
    B & .XX*** & & & & \\
    C & .XX*** & .XX*** & & & \\
    D & .XX*** & .XX*** & .XX*** & &\\
    E & .XX*** & .XX*** & .XX*** & .XX*** & \pnode[0.6em, -1.3ex]{X} \\
    \bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\ncline[linewidth = 0.4pt]{A}{X}
\end{postscript}

\end{document} 

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
  • That's a quite good solution, perfect! However, using TeXStudio and trying to compile this, it results in an error (Package auto-pst-pdf Error: . Or turn off auto-pst-pdf.}). If I set it on XeLaTeX, it works but then other issues occur (wrong signs etc.) – Jens Jan 31 '19 at 21:38
  • I compiled this with xelatex. Did you obtain these wrong signs with exactly this code? – Bernard Jan 31 '19 at 21:40
  • yes, but in the whole document, not in this table - sorry, if this is offtopic! – Jens Jan 31 '19 at 21:42
  • Could ypu post a minimal (yet complete) code reproducing your problems? – Bernard Jan 31 '19 at 21:43
  • I will try this tomorrow! Thanks so far for your help! – Jens Jan 31 '19 at 21:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.