3

Triying to use a patch for \overarc from this answer https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/409106/54817

I got this result

enter image description here

\documentclass{article}

%\usepackage{fix-cm}

\usepackage{arcs}
\usepackage{etoolbox}

\makeatletter
\patchcmd{\over@under@arc}
{\relsize{-10}}{\renewcommand\RSpercentTolerance{5}\relsize{-10}}{}{\fail}
\makeatother

\begin{document}
\Huge

$$\overarc{AB}$$

\end{document}

Log file:
https://pastebin.com/T5NRMvtb

  • The problem is just the same as explained by Ulrike: arcs tries larger sizes, but there aren't defined above \Huge and the bug reappears. – egreg Feb 8 at 13:11
  • Same result without \Huge . – Salim Bou Feb 8 at 13:15
  • Adding fix-cm package ( without the patch) I got the same thing – Salim Bou Feb 8 at 13:18
  • Looks as if you found an example which shows that @egreg patch is needed too ... – Ulrike Fischer Feb 8 at 13:37
  • My question is why those dimensions appear before \overarc ? – Salim Bou Feb 8 at 13:51
3

Different approach, based on Big tilde in math mode

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{scalerel}
\usepackage{stackengine}

\newcommand\reallywidetilde[1]{\ThisStyle{%
  \setbox0=\hbox{$\SavedStyle#1$}%
  \stackengine{-.5\LMpt}{$\SavedStyle#1$}{%
    \stretchto{\scaleto{\SavedStyle\mkern.2mu\frown}{.4\wd0}}{.5\ht0}%
  }{O}{c}{F}{T}{S}%
}}

\def\test#1{$%
  \reallywidetilde{#1}\,
  \scriptstyle\reallywidetilde{#1}\,
  \scriptscriptstyle\reallywidetilde{#1}
$\par}

\parskip 1ex
\begin{document}

\test{abcdefghijklm}
\test{abcdefghijk}
\test{abcdefghi}
\test{abcdefg}
\test{abcde}
\test{abc}
\test{ab}
\end{document}

enter image description here

  • Thank's for the answer but my question is on the patch explained in my question why those dimensions appear in front of \overarc – Salim Bou Feb 8 at 16:27
0
\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{arcs} 
\usepackage{etoolbox}

\makeatletter
\providecommand\@gobblethree[3]{}
\patchcmd{\over@under@arc}
 {\@gobbletwo}
 {\@gobblethree}
 {}{}
\makeatother

\begin{document}

$$\overarc{AB}$$

\end{document}

I also have the same problem. I have tried to add the above code and it works prefectly.

Refer to the link https://xetex.tug.narkive.com/pBGTS2zG/the-arcs-package#post14, it stated out the problem of the package arcs. To update the code in the package arcs, I refer the link \overarc command from arcs package and xwatermark .

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.