2

I tried using a template that is working well for a more numerical table but I created a monster trying to adapt it to new needs. Here it is the mwe:

\documentclass[a4paper, 11pt]{scrreprt}
\usepackage{amsmath,booktabs,siunitx}
\usepackage[version=4]{mhchem}  
\sisetup{separate-uncertainty}

\newcommand{\tabhead}[1]{%
    \smash[b]{%
        \begin{tabular}[t]{@{}c@{}}#1\end{tabular}%
    }%
}

\begin{document}

\begin{table}[h]

    \caption{Caption here.}\label{whatever}

    \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0pt}

    \begin{tabular*}{\linewidth}{
            @{\extracolsep{\fill}}
            r
            S[table-format=2.1]
            r
            S[table-format=1.2]
            r
            S[table-format=4.0]
            r
            r
        }
        \toprule
        {\textbf{Material} } &
        {\tabhead{ \textbf{Mean Pore Radius} \\ \textbf{(\si{\nano\meter})}}} &
        { \textbf{Model}} &
        {\tabhead{\textbf{Salt Concentration} \\ \textbf{({M} \ce{NaCl})}}} &
        {\textbf{pH}} &
        {\textbf{Buffer}} &
        {\tabhead{Range of Dextrans \\ \textbf{(kDa)}}} &
        {\tabhead{Reference \\ \textbf{(--)}}} \\
        &&&  \\
        \midrule
        LongName AA         &   18.4 & Simple model   &   0   & 20 mM Bis-Tris          &   6.5     &   0.18 to 500      &  [1,2]   \\ 
        LongName AA         &   25.8 & complex model  & 0.12  &  10 mM Tris-\ce{HCl}    &   7.2     & 0.18 to 20000      &  [3] \\  
        AA LongName  AA     &   15.0 & complex model  & 1     &  10 mM phosphate        &   8.0     &  4 to 400          &  [4,2]\\ 

        \bottomrule
    \end{tabular*}
    \label{}

\end{table}

\end{document}

It compiles without error but on the one hand it doesn't fit in the page so I cannot see the whole table, and there are other many wrong things like:

  • headers overlap. No proper distance between the titles.
  • How to arrange the elements right-justified but centering the header?
  • should I use tabularx in this situation?

Any help is appreciated!

5

There's little hope to make those long headers to fit in the page limit. I suggest to use acronyms that are explained just below the table (or in the caption, perhaps).

\documentclass[a4paper, 11pt]{scrreprt}
\usepackage{amsmath,booktabs,siunitx}
\usepackage[version=4]{mhchem}  
\sisetup{separate-uncertainty}

\begin{document}

\begin{table}[htp]

\caption{Caption here.}\label{whatever}

\setlength{\tabcolsep}{0pt}

\footnotesize

\begin{tabular*}{\linewidth}{
  @{\extracolsep{\fill}}
  l
  S[table-format=2.1]
  l
  S[table-format=1.2]
  l
  S[table-format=1.1]
  l
  r
}
\toprule
\textbf{Material} & {\textbf{MPR}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{Model}} & {\textbf{SC}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{pH}} & {\textbf{B}} & \textbf{RD} & \textbf{Ref.} \\
\midrule
LongName AA    & 18.4 & Simple model  & 0    & 20 mM Bis-Tris      & 6.5 & 0.18 to 500   &  [1,2] \\ 
LongName AA    & 25.8 & complex model & 0.12 & 10 mM Tris-\ce{HCl} & 7.2 & 0.18 to 20000 &  [3] \\  
AA LongName AA & 15.0 & complex model & 1    & 10 mM phosphate     & 8.0 & 4 to 400      &  [4,2] \\ 
\midrule[\heavyrulewidth]
\end{tabular*}
\begin{tabular*}{\textwidth}[t]{@{\extracolsep{\fill}}lll}
MPR: Mean Pore Radius (\si{\nano\meter}) &
SC: Salt Concentration (M \ce{NaCl}) &
B: Buffer \\
RD: Range of Dextrans (kDa) & Ref.: Reference
\end{tabular*}

\end{table}

\end{document}

Without \footnotesize the columns would be too squeezed. Depending on your text width, \small could do.

enter image description here

  • how about three part table? – subham soni Mar 5 at 14:13
  • Maybe it's not necessary to add model three times? The column head should be enough. – Bernard Mar 5 at 14:21
  • Thanks for the suggestions! I like the way to display the acronyms. I might use it for the text inside the table and keep some headers. – egil137 Mar 5 at 14:21
  • @Bernard totally. This was just a sample text I added to get an idea. I think I´ll actually use acronyms for the name of the models and add them at the bottom as suggested. – egil137 Mar 5 at 14:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.