The amsrefs package has the shortalphabetic style which is similar to alphabetic but less verbose (for example, the year is excluded). Is there any way to do that with biblatex?

Currently, I have

\usepackage[style=alphabetic, backref=true, backend=biber, hyperref=true, giveninits=true]{biblatex}

And for .bib file, I have

  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  eprinttype = {arxiv},
  eprint = {0904.1247},
  primaryClass = {math},
  date = {2009-04-07},
  keywords = {Geometric Satake,Representation theory,Geometric reps,Trace},
  author = {Ben-Zvi, David and Nadler, David}

  langid = {american},
  title = {Integral Transforms and {{Drinfeld}} Centers in Derived Algebraic Geometry},
  volume = {23},
  issn = {0894-0347, 1088-6834},
  doi = {10.1090/S0894-0347-10-00669-7},
  number = {4},
  journaltitle = {Journal of the American Mathematical Society},
  shortjournal = {J. Amer. Math. Soc.},
  date = {2010},
  pages = {909-966},
  keywords = {DAG,Trace},
  author = {Ben-Zvi, David and Francis, John and Nadler, David}

The bibliography would appear like so

enter image description here

But if use amsrefs with shortalphabetic option


Bibliography would become

enter image description here

The main thing I like about the 2nd style (amsrefs) is that the keys (eg. [BZFN], [BZN]) don't include the years. It would be great to make biblatex produce [BFN] and [BN] instead of [BFN10] and [BN09].


  • It would really help if you could show us what you have so far and could point out concrete changes to the output you get. I'm not familiar with shortalphabetic and I doubt there will be an exact match in the arsenal of readily available biblatex styles, but biblatex is quite customisable and some things are done easily and more complicated things can be achieved with a bit more work. – moewe Mar 6 '19 at 10:05
  • @moewe Thanks! I added more concrete examples. – QcH Mar 6 '19 at 10:32
  • For arXiv articles that have not been published in a journal (yet) I usually recommend the type @online instead of @article since @articles usually expect a journal and a volume field, which those entries normally lack. – moewe Mar 6 '19 at 10:42

If this is only about the alphabetic label, you will want to have a look at \DeclareLabelalphaTemplate. The following takes the default definition from biblatex's alphabetic style and removes the two digits from the year.

See also §4.5.5 Labels of the biblatex documentation, pp. 198-206.


\usepackage[style=alphabetic, backref=true, backend=biber, giveninits=true]{biblatex}




[GMS] M. Goossens, F. Mittelbach and A. Samarin. The LaTeX Companion. 1st ed. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1994. 528 pp. (cit. on p. 1).//[SR] E. Sigfridsson and U. Ryde. ‘Comparison of methods for deriving atomic charges from the electrostatic potential and moments’. In: Journal of Computational Chemistry 19.4 (1998), pp. 377–395. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199803)19:4<377::AID-JCC1>3.0.CO;2-P (cit. on p. 1).

  • Thanks a lot for the quick reply! Does this also do dedup automatically? Support before, I had [ABC18], [ABC19], would it become [ABCa] [ABCb] automatically? – QcH Mar 6 '19 at 10:45
  • 1
    @QcH It should. Why don't you try it out? In case you don't have example entries at hand, cite knuth:ct:a and knuth:ct:b from biblatex-examples.bib. – moewe Mar 6 '19 at 10:46
  • Awesome! It works. Thanks a lot! – QcH Mar 6 '19 at 10:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.