2

I am currently working on my Bachelors thesis with TexLive 2018 in TexStudio. My University demands the usage of the CiteThemRight reference styling, which is an adaption of the Harvard referencing standard. (This question is edited based on the discussion in the comments)

Here's how it looks right now: Current Literature Layout

Here's the current status with highlights and notes on what needs to change. Please note that the date added text should of course be in the same font and size as the rest, I just edited the picture badly.

Wanted Literature Layout

This is how the literature is currently defined:

\usepackage[comma]{natbib}
\setcitestyle{aysep={,}} 
\bibliographystyle{agsm}

I have found some questions, linked in this comment where @Mico's answers suggest changing the style defined in the agsm.bst (more, a copy thereof). I have tried to find my way in the file but cant make heads or tails with it. Thank you

  • Welcome to TeX.SE. The strength of the natbib citation management package is its control over the appearance of citation call-outs. The natbib package doesn't have much of a role in the way the bib entries are formatted. Which bibliography style do you use at present? – Mico Apr 9 at 17:56
  • Thank you for your comment! Currently, I define the bib style with \bibliographystyle{agsm}. Is that what you meant? – JFNT Apr 9 at 18:02
1

Something like this? Note the use of the @misc entry type and the placement of both the URL and date-accessed information in a field called note.

enter image description here

\RequirePackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents}{mybib.bib}
@misc{bach:99,
  author  = "Bach, J.",
  year    = 1999, 
  title   = "{Test} Strategy: {What} is it? {What} does it look like?",
  note     = "URL: \url{http://www.satisfice.com/presentations/strategy.pdf} (\emph{Date Accessed: 1~March 2019})",
}
\end{filecontents}

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{natbib}
\bibliographystyle{agsm} % part of the 'harvard' package
\usepackage{xurl}
\makeatletter
\def\url@itstyle{\def\UrlFont{\itshape}} % define a new URL style called "it"
\makeatother
\urlstyle{it}

\begin{document}
\citet{bach:99}
\bibliography{mybib}
\end{document}
  • Hello and thank you, this looks very promising. This means I would have to manually edit the .bib file? I will try this as soon as I am able! – JFNT Apr 9 at 18:36
  • @JFNT - You seemed to indicate earlier that you must use the agsm bibliography style. When using the agsm style, the note field is placed before the url field. However, you write-up seems to suggest that the "Accessed on" information must come after, not before, the url field. That's why I'm suggesting combining pieces of information related to the url and its accessed-on date in a single note field. – Mico Apr 9 at 18:44
  • The use of the agsmstyle is not mandatory, but only the CiteThemRight standard. The only thing I am sure of is that the example I have given is needed, my supervisor has provided me with it. Would not using agsm make it possible to have the needed styling without modifying the .bib file? – JFNT Apr 9 at 18:47
  • I'm afraid I'm not familiar with the "CiteThemRight standard. (Is it explained somewhere on the Internet?) As I wrote earlier, your write-up seems to state that the Date Accessed information -- presumably contained in a field called note, right? -- must come after, not before, the url field. Unfortunately, that's not what the agsm style is set to do. If you can find a more suitable bib style, by all means switch to it. – Mico Apr 9 at 18:51
  • Thank you for your response! I have found this and that answer of yours where you describe how to edit the agsm style directly. Could you please show me how I would do the same thing for my styling needs? I wager that it is possible because all needed values are in the bib file so I see no requirement to add it manually as a note. – JFNT Apr 9 at 19:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.