I want to write a "big" equation, not in display-math mode -- as given by the equation environment -- but in inline-math mode, say


How can I enlarge it?

  • 1
    Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like \documentclass{article} \usepackage{relsize} \begin{document} $\mathlarger{\mathlarger{\mathlarger{E=mc^2}}}$ compare to $E=mc^2$ \end{document} ? Of course, if you add more or less \mathlargers then the thing will grow less or more. – user121799 May 10 '19 at 2:49
  • 1
    There is also $\displaystyle E=mc^2$ which should raise the exponent some. The default is \textstyle. – John Kormylo May 10 '19 at 3:43

Will one of \large, \Large, \LARGE, \huge, or \Huge do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.

enter image description here

{\tiny $E=mc^2$}
{\scriptsize $E=mc^2$}
{\footnotesize $E=mc^2$}
{\small $E=mc^2$}
{\color{red} $E=mc^2$ --- \texttt{\textbackslash normalsize}} % \normalsize is the default
{\large $E=mc^2$}
{\Large $E=mc^2$}
{\LARGE $E=mc^2$}
{\huge $E=mc^2$}
{\Huge $E=mc^2$}

Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.

  • that helps , thanks a lot – Quintis May 10 '19 at 6:29

Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.


\usepackage{graphicx}% \scalebox


    \noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\\[1ex]
    enlarged font: \scalebox{2}{$X_2^2$}\\[1ex]
    % or using the \enlargeMath command that we 
    % defined to eliminate the scale factor.
  • You may want to mention what the difference is between \scalebox{2}{$X_2^2$} and {\huge$X_2^2$}. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between \scalebox{2.06}{X} and {\huge X}. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.) – Mico May 10 '19 at 4:24
  • To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead! – M. Al Jumaily May 10 '19 at 4:27
  • \scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of \scalebox{2.5}{X} and {\Huge X}, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of \scalebox{0.5}{X} and {\tiny X}, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility. – Mico May 10 '19 at 4:36
  • Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use \tiny, \Huge, etc. vs \scalebox? – M. Al Jumaily May 10 '19 at 4:44
  • 1
    If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for \normalsize-\large-\Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ \large, \Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by \large, \Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, \scalebox{}{} is more convenient. – Mico May 10 '19 at 4:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.