1

I've been informed by my publisher that if I'm using a shorthand for a work, I should use it for every citation, including the first one. (Obviously, the full reference will appear in the list of shorthands and in the bibliography.) The closest I've seen to this question is here, but the solution for biblatex (verbose) of course doesn't work with biblatex-chicago.

MWE:

\documentclass[12pt]{memoir}

\usepackage[notes,shorthandibid,backend=biber,addendum=false,sorting=nyt,giveninits=true,useprefix=false,shorthandfull]{biblatex-chicago}

\usepackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents*}{jobname.bib}
@book{lastname98,
author = {Firstname Lastname},
title = {A Book},
shorthand = {Book},
date = {1898},
address = {City},
}
\end{filecontents*}
\addbibresource{jobname.bib}

\begin{document}

\printshorthands

Have a sentence.\autocite{lastname98}

\printbibliography

\end{document}
2

This one actually is in the manual (p137):

User laudecir requested a way to present a shorthand even in the first citation of a given work. The new shorthandfirst option in the notes & bibliography style can be set to true either in the preamble or in individual entries, and should make this functionality simpler to activate than the \shorthandcite command.

And indeed \usepackage[notes,shorthandibid,backend=biber,addendum=false,sorting=nyt,giveninits=true,useprefix=false,shorthandfull,shorthandfirst]{biblatex-chicago} results in: enter image description here

2
  • Oops, hm, yeah, I might be looking at an out-of-date version of the manual--mine doesn't have that many pages! I shall download a new one, so thanks very much for bringing this to my attention. – Erika Jun 4 '19 at 17:15
  • Haha I had the same question and the same problem. Had to download the newest manual. – Paul Jan 21 at 6:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.