0

I am new to latex and am trying to create the following in latex: enter image description here

It looks similar to what I want when I use this:

$\scriptsize 0_{{\big T}{\small 1}} =

However, I get the following error message:

! Missing delimiter (. inserted).
<to be read again>
T
l.10 $\scriptsize 0_{{\big T
}{\small 1}} =
I was expecting to see something like `(' or `\{' or
`\}' here. If you typed, e.g., `{' instead of `\{', you
should probably delete the `{' by typing `1' now, so that
braces don't get unbalanced. Otherwise just proceed.
Acceptable delimiters are characters whose \delcode is
nonnegative, or you can use `\delimiter <delimiter code>'.

I am not sure how to fix the error and am hoping someone on here can help me :)

  • 1
    \big does not change the font size in math mode but is used for delimiters like { or )... – leandriis Jun 5 at 14:47
  • 1
    Does \documentclass{article} \begin{document} $ ^0T_1 = $ \end{document} give the desired output? i.stack.imgur.com/7UhO8.png – leandriis Jun 5 at 14:49
  • 1
    \big must be followed by a delimiter; it doesn't change the size of arbitrary symbols. What do you need, precisely? – egreg Jun 5 at 14:49
  • 2
    in addition to \Big being an error, the text size changes such as \scriptsize and \small should not be used in math mode (they give a warning and do not work as you might expect) – David Carlisle Jun 5 at 14:53
  • @leandriis Yes, thank you! – Fee Jun 5 at 15:30
1

Instead of trying to change the font size of the elements, use super- and subscripts as shown in the following example:

\documentclass{article} 
\begin{document} 
$ ^0T_1 = $ 
\end{document}

enter image description here

  • The drawing in the question looks more like a sans serif letter than an ordinary italic variable. Maybe {\top} would work, although I think a larger size would be better. (The braces enclosing \top are necessary to disable the usual spacing; this should be an "ordinary" character, although probably a "large operator" without limits could work.) – barbara beeton Jun 5 at 18:50
  • @barbarabeeton: It is indeed true that the code does not exactly reproduce the sketch in the question. However, the OP seemed to be satisfied iwth this solution that I already included in a previous comment. – leandriis Jun 5 at 20:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.