Is there a way to right justify the second field (after the \dotfill)?

I tried using flushright, but that did not do what I was hoping for.




Acceleration, Non-plotted,{C12.24}
Acceleration, Unplotted,{C12.24}
Active Terminal Guidance,{FD5.2, XFD5.2}
Administrative Shuttles,{J2.0, XJ2.0, YJ2.0}
Warp-Field Distortion Mine Versus ESGs,{M93.36}
Warp-Field Distortion Mine Versus Status Fields,{M93.34}
Warp-Field Distortion Mine Versus Temporal Elevator,{M93.37}

\csvreader[no head]{Annex01}{1=\name,2=\whereis}{\noindent\name\dotfill\whereis\par}

  • 1
    Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. To highlight code-blocks, either indent them by four spaces or use the {} on the gui. – Andrew Jun 10 '19 at 4:38
  • Could you please add a sketch of the desired output? – leandriis Jun 10 '19 at 7:04
  • I am not sure what is meant by In thus variable OUT. As I understand the filecontents command anything in a set of brackets is a field. There should only be two fields. The result I am trying to achieve is: Acceleration, Non-plotted …….. C12.24 Administrative Shuttles …...…… J2.0, XJ2.0, YJ2.0 Warp-Field Distortion Mine Versus Temporal Elevator …………….. M93.37 I was able to get close using a access report but this is only one report of many that I am trying to put into a single document. – Ken Kazinski Jun 15 '19 at 17:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.