Don't understand why there is some extra equation number which is coming in the last line of the equation

    \label{eq: non dimensional lagrangian}
     \mathcal{L}&=\mathcal{T}-\mathcal{V} \nonumber \\
       \mathcal{V}&=\frac{EI_{zz}}{2L}\, \int_{0}^{1} \hspace{-0.05in} \left(\frac{\partial^2\psi(\eta)}{\partial \eta^2}\right)^2 \mathrm{d}\eta +\frac{L^2}{2}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\,k_{1,j}\left(\psi(\eta)\right)^2 \nonumber\\
        \mathcal{T}&=\frac{\rho A\omega^2L^3}{2}\, \int_{0}^{1}  \hspace{-0.05in} \left( \psi(\eta)\right)^2 \mathrm{d}\eta \nonumber \\
     \mathcal{\bar{L}}&=\frac{\beta^4}{2}\, \int_{0}^{1}  \hspace{-0.05in} \left( \psi(\eta)\right)^2 \mathrm{d}\eta-\frac{1}{2}\, \int_{0}^{1} \hspace{-0.05in} \left(\frac{\partial^2\psi(\eta)}{\partial \eta^2}\right)^2 \mathrm{d}\eta\\ &\quad{}-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\,K_{1,j}\left(\psi(\eta)\right)^2    
     \end{split}\\ \nonumber \\
  • 2
    Remove the last \\ – egreg Jul 23 '19 at 10:33
  • and how to bring the equation number to the last line, now it is on somewhat upper – vijay Jul 23 '19 at 10:40
  • Don't use split. – egreg Jul 23 '19 at 10:42

You have wrong \\ in your input.

If you want the number to sit next to the last line, don't use split:




\begin{subequations}\label{eq: non dimensional lagrangian}
\mathcal{L} &= \mathcal{T}-\mathcal{V} \nonumber \\
\mathcal{V} &= \frac{EI_{zz}}{2L} \int_{0}^{1} \left(
                 \frac{\partial^2\psi(\eta)}{\partial \eta^2}
               \right)^2 \diff\eta +
               \frac{L^2}{2}\sum_{j=1}^{n} k_{1,j}(\psi(\eta))^2 \nonumber \\
\mathcal{T} &= \frac{\rho A\omega^2L^3}{2} \int_{0}^{1} (\psi(\eta))^2 \diff\eta \nonumber \\
\bar{\mathcal{L}} &= \frac{\beta^4}{2} \int_{0}^{1} (\psi(\eta))^2 \diff\eta -
                     \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{1} \left(
                       \frac{\partial^2\psi(\eta)}{\partial \eta^2}
                     \right)^2 \diff\eta \nonumber \\


I've made some changes to your input, in particular removing useless \left and \right. Also \mathcal{\bar{L}}, while yielding the expected result, should be \bar{\mathcal{L}} which is sounder on a logical basis.

Use \diff instead of explicit \mathrm{d} (there are many reasons to). I removed the explicit spacings you used.

enter image description here

You may find split more logical and I can agree. In this case, add the tbtags option when calling amsmath and all numbers will be aligned with the bottom line in splits.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Within align, I would find it more logical to nest aligned. I've forgotten where the equation number is placed by default. – barbara beeton Jul 23 '19 at 17:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.