This is arguably wrong, but it's documented:

And it's like this since at least 0.6:
\documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
\usepackage[]{circuitikz-0.6}
\begin{document}
\begin{circuitikz}[american
]
\draw (0,0) to[ecapacitor] ++(2,0);
\draw (0,-2) to[polar capacitor] ++(2,0);
\end{circuitikz}
\end{document}

so I am quite afraid of changing it --- it's difficult to spot in a big circuit and can give nasty surprises.
I could try to consider it for the 1.0
release, maybe; --- also with the other thing that I do not like a lot, the fact that invert
does not change voltage directions. But I don't know, I like the principle of least surprise...
update:
in the next version of circuitikz
, 0.9.5, there will be a new component, curved capacitor
:


Yep, I know, it's "its polarity", no "it's polarity"... Can I blame the automatic corrector?
ecapacitor
andpolar capacitor
seem to have opposite directions. Strange.