Is there a way to print out the command line used to compile the latex document? The document is compiled using an editor and I'd like to get what it is specifically using.
-
If you happen to use Linux, you could alias the name of the latex-compiler used by your editor into a shell script that just prints out its parameters– RavenSep 26, 2019 at 13:39
1 Answer
In Linux you can print all processes from within your document and grep
the relevant line. The output of this command can be printed to the document. Adapted from Write18: capturing shell (script) output as command/variable?:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
Command used is
{\catcode`_=12 \ttfamily
\input{|"ps aux|grep -Eoh '[a-z]+latex.*\jobname.*'|head -n 1" }
}
\end{document}
Example result:
Note that this requires to set --shell-escape
, and probably if you know how to set that you can also find the default compile options, but that is not really the point.
Note also that this does not work when you change things like -progname
or -jobname
, in that case you should modify the grep
regex accordingly. The same holds for using a non-LaTeX compiler, like pdfTeX or ConTeXt.
In Windows you can do something similar with the wmic
command (Windows Management Instrumentation Command-Line Utility). However, because this includes file paths with backslashes, it results in undefined command sequence errors when it is used directly in \input
(i.e., LaTeX thinks that C:\Program Files
contains the command \Program
and tries to execute this command). So you can save the output of the wmic
command to a file instead and print the contents of this file with for example \lstinputlisting
from the listings
package, which allows to break lines.
MWE:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{listings}
\begin{document}
Command used is
\immediate\write18{wmic process get commandline /format:list |findstr escape > cmdout.tmp}
\lstinputlisting[breaklines]{cmdout.tmp}
\end{document}
Result:
-
This is what I want but Is there an equivalent for windows?– user184375Sep 26, 2019 at 16:38
-
-
Thanks, exactly what I wanted... and look ma! no MWE!– user184375Sep 26, 2019 at 23:34