0

I have tried to use this symbol in one of my equations:

\mathfrak{\mathcal{l}}

But, instead of showing that letter in mathcal and mathfrak styles, it shows updownarrow?!

I mean: \mathfrak{\mathcal{l}} gives exactly the same command of \updownarrow

Is it something wrong going here or there is a logical explanation?! I have checked it in WinEdt and also in the following online LaTeX equation editor: https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php

Both give the same result!!

Thank you so much

| improve this question | | | | |
  • 4
    \mathfrak and \mathcal are not ornaments to a font (in the manner of \hat or \dot). Rather, they are separate fonts in themselves. Thus, it makes no sense to try to combine them as you did. – Steven B. Segletes Sep 29 '19 at 22:46
  • 3
    also the is no lowercase mathcal. See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/231322/… if you need a caligraphic. – c.p. Sep 29 '19 at 22:46
  • What would a calligraphic fraktur letter be? (Accepting of course fraktur is a kind of calligraphy, but a very different kind to the loopy kind represented by \mathcal) – Au101 Sep 30 '19 at 1:12
  • Your second question is completely separate from the first one, and in general it's better to make two posts in such cases. – Torbjørn T. Sep 30 '19 at 16:11
  • Thanks for all these amazing comments .. Yeah, sure, the second part is separated and it can be found here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/510483/… – Sitra Oct 1 '19 at 0:51
12

Math alphabets don't combine, so with

\mathfrak{\mathcal{l}}

you get exactly the same as with

\mathcal{l}

which yields a “random” symbol, because \mathcal only has effect on uppercase letters.

| improve this answer | | | | |
  • Unless you load unicode-math, which does have 𝓵, 𝕝 and 𝖑. – Davislor Oct 1 '19 at 4:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.