0

I have read the related question: Tikz Understand white space between node and draw, and tried the solutions proposed therein.

I am trying to draw a phylogenetic tree. I define the leaves and internal node as tikz's \node, and connect them with \draw.

However, I can't seem to get rid of the gap between line segments in the drawn picture:

Here's what I'm writing to generate the above diagram:

\begin{tikzpicture}
  \tikzstyle{internal}=[inner sep=0, outer sep=0, line cap=rect]
  \node (C) at (0, 0) {$C$};
  \node (H) at (1, 0) {$H$};
  \node[internal] (CH) at (0.5, 0.5) {};
  \draw (C) -- (CH) -- (H);
\end{tikzpicture}

It includes the inner sep=0, outer sep=0, and line cap=rect options recommended in a similar question (linked above).

  • 4
    \coordinate (CH) at (0.5, 0.5);? – Schrödinger's cat Oct 8 at 8:38
  • 1
    Use of \tikzstyle is discouraged. One should use \tikzset{internal/.style={inner sep=0, outer sep=0, line cap=rect}} instead. Though of course, a coordinate would be the proper solution in this case. And that could be done in the optional argument of tikzpicture: \begin{tikzpicture}[internal/.style={...}] – Skillmon Oct 8 at 8:39
  • @Schrödinger'scat You're 100% right, I should have used \coordinate. My bad! – ning Oct 8 at 10:28
  • If you are drawing multiple trees, you should consider using one of the libraries or packages designed for this. – cfr Oct 8 at 22:21
2

You can do it in a single line like this:

\documentclass[tikz, border=2pt]{standalone}

\begin{document}

\begin{tikzpicture}[inner sep=2pt]
  \draw (0,0) node [below left]{$C$} -- ++(.5,.5) -- ++(.5,-.5) node[below right]{$H$};   
\end{tikzpicture}

\end{document}

enter image description here

Addendum:

It is easy to also keep coordinates' names for later reference using:

\draw (0,0) coordinate[label={below left:$C$}](C) -- ++(.5,.5)coordinate(CH) -- ++(.5,-.5) coordinate[label={below right:$H$}](H);
1

Schrödinger's cat was right. I should be using coordinates instead of nodes for the internal nodes of the tree. This is my preferred solution over AboAmmar's ++ syntax since I want to save the coordinate of the internal node for use later on.

  • ,@ning -- TikZ is powerful enough that you can still keep coordinates' names for later reference with a small modification on my code (see addendum). Relative coordinates are usually easier to use and modify, IMO. – AboAmmar Oct 20 at 14:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.