5

Writing an equation in LaTeX

How can I write this equation in LaTeX? I am getting an error:

missing inserted $

C(Z)=\frac{-0.5002\,  (+/- 0.1000)\,  z^-1 + 2.161 \, (+/- 0.1821) \, z^-2 - 1.744 \, (+/- 0.1489)\,  z^-3 - 2.138 \, (

              +/- 0.2009)\,  z^-4 + 2.0073 \, (+/- 0.2002) \, z^-5 + 1.047 (+/- 0.1986)\,  z^-6 - 1.124 (

              +/- 0.1978) \, z^-7 - 2.1009 \, (+/- 0.2176)\,  z^-8 + 0.1732 \, (+/- 0.1959)\,  z^-9 + 2.305 (

              +/- 0.2109)\,  z^-10 + 0.7807 \, (+/- 0.1846) \, z^-11 - 1.436 \, (+/- 0.225) \, z^-12 - 2.605 (

              +/- 0.2003) \, z^-13 + 2.405 \, (+/- 0.2306) \, z^-14 + 1.517 (+/- 0.1872)\,  z^-15 - 2.244 (

                                                   +/- 0.1778) \, z^-16 + 0.6634 (+/- 0.05466) \, z^-19

      }{1 - 2.738 (+/- 0.07274) z^-1 + 1.241 (+/- 0.2085) z^-2 + 1.997 (+/- 0.1935) z^-3

              - 1.033 (+/- 0.2873) z^-6 - 0.2646 (+/- 0.3029) z^-5 - 1.415 (+/- 0.2352) z^-6

              + 0.4815 (+/- 0.2701) z^-8 + 1.313 (+/- 0.249) z^-8 + 0.3993 (+/- 0.2877) z^-9

              - 0.7446 (+/- 0.2492) z^-10 - 1.7777(+/- 0.2392) z^-11 + 1.443 (+/- 0.2471) z^-12

              - 1.054 (+/- 0.2877) z^-13 + 0.7(+/- 0.277719) z^-14 + 1.47 (+/- 0.1926) z^-15

                                           - 1.847 (+/- 0.20771) z^-16 + 0.6023 (+/- 0.06359) z^-17}
  • 6
    You are not allowed to use blank line in math modes. If you remove all the blank lines in your equation, your missing inserted $ error will disappear. – KersouMan Nov 21 '19 at 11:08
  • 4
    Moreover, you might want to use \pm instead of +/- and to wrap all your exponents inside curly braces (e.g. z^{-2} instead of z^-2) to avoid having a minus sign as exponent and the number inline with the z. – KersouMan Nov 21 '19 at 11:24
17

Some suggestions and observations (some already made by @KersouMan):

  • Don't provide all-blank lines in a display math environment

  • Write \pm rather than +/-

  • Encase the exponent terms in curly braces, i.e., write z^{-19} rather than z^-19

  • Since the numerator and denominator contain 17 and 18 separate additive terms, respectively, using conventional \frac notation cannot possibly work. I suggest you list the numerator and denominator separately.

enter image description here

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\newcommand{\mybox}[1]{\parbox[t]{0.75\textwidth}{\raggedright$\displaystyle #1$}}
\begin{document}

\begin{align*}
C(Z)&=\frac{U(Z)}{V(Z)}\,,\\
\shortintertext{where}
U(z)&=\mybox{ -0.5002 (\pm 0.1000)\,z^{-1} + 2.161 (\pm 0.1821)\,z^{-2} 
              -1.744  (\pm 0.1489)\,z^{-3} - 2.138 (\pm 0.2009)\,z^{-4} 
              +2.0073 (\pm 0.2002)\,z^{-5} + 1.047 (\pm 0.1986)\,z^{-6} 
              -1.124  (\pm 0.1978)\,z^{-7} - 2.1009(\pm 0.2176)\,z^{-8} 
              +0.1732 (\pm 0.1959)\,z^{-9} + 2.305 (\pm 0.2109)\,z^{-10} 
              +0.7807 (\pm 0.1846)\,z^{-11}- 1.436 (\pm 0.225 )\,z^{-12} 
              -2.605  (\pm 0.2003)\,z^{-13}+ 2.405 (\pm 0.2306)\,z^{-14} 
              +1.517  (\pm 0.1872)\,z^{-15}- 2.244 (\pm 0.1778)\,z^{-16} 
              +0.6634 (\pm 0.05466)\,z^{-19}}\\
\shortintertext{and} 
V(Z)&=\mybox{1-2.738  (\pm 0.07274)\,z^{-1}+ 1.241 (\pm 0.2085)\,z^{-2} 
              +1.997  (\pm 0.1935)\,z^{-3} - 1.033 (\pm 0.2873)\,z^{-4} 
              -0.2646 (\pm 0.3029)\,z^{-5} - 1.415 (\pm 0.2352)\,z^{-6} 
              +0.4815 (\pm 0.2701)\,z^{-8} + 1.313 (\pm 0.249 )\,z^{-8} 
              +0.3993 (\pm 0.2877)\,z^{-9} - 0.7446(\pm 0.2492)\,z^{-10} 
              -1.7777 (\pm 0.2392)\,z^{-11}+ 1.443 (\pm 0.2471)\,z^{-12} 
              -1.054  (\pm 0.2877)\,z^{-13}+ 0.7   (\pm 0.277719)\,z^{-14} 
              +1.47   (\pm 0.1926)\,z^{-15}- 1.847 (\pm 0.20771)\,z^{-16} 
              +0.6023 (\pm 0.06359)\,z^{-17}\,.}
\end{align*}

\end{document}
  • One case error: U(z) should be U(Z). – TRiG Nov 22 '19 at 14:31
  • @TRiG -- I was wondering when the typo would get pointed out... – Mico Nov 22 '19 at 15:56
8

In the same vein as Mico's fine answer, I propose also to do other alignments, in order to get a better overall view.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathtools,array}
\newcommand{\mybox}[1]{\parbox[t]{0.75\textwidth}{\raggedright$\displaystyle #1$}}
\begin{document}

\begin{align*}
C(Z)&=\frac{U(Z)}{V(Z)},\\
\shortintertext{where}
U(z)&=
  \begin{array}[t]{*{2}{ @{}>{{}}l@{}>{(}l<{)}@{\,}l } @{}}
  -0.5002 & \pm 0.1000  & z^{-1}  & + 2.161  & \pm 0.1821 & z^{-2} \\ 
  -1.744  & \pm 0.1489  & z^{-3}  & - 2.138  & \pm 0.2009 & z^{-4} \\ 
  +2.0073 & \pm 0.2002  & z^{-5}  & + 1.047  & \pm 0.1986 & z^{-6} \\ 
  -1.124  & \pm 0.1978  & z^{-7}  & - 2.1009 & \pm 0.2176 & z^{-8} \\ 
  +0.1732 & \pm 0.1959  & z^{-9}  & + 2.305  & \pm 0.2109 & z^{-10} \\ 
  +0.7807 & \pm 0.1846  & z^{-11} & - 1.436  & \pm 0.225  & z^{-12} \\ 
  -2.605  & \pm 0.2003  & z^{-13} & + 2.405  & \pm 0.2306 & z^{-14} \\ 
  +1.517  & \pm 0.1872  & z^{-15} & - 2.244  & \pm 0.1778 & z^{-16} \\ 
  +0.6634 & \pm 0.05466 & z^{-19} 
  \end{array}
\\
\shortintertext{and} 
V(Z)&=1
  \begin{array}[t]{*{2}{ @{}>{{}}l@{}>{(}l<{)}@{\,}l } @{}}
  -2.738  & \pm 0.07274 & z^{-1}  & + 1.241  & \pm 0.2085   & z^{-2} \\ 
  +1.997  & \pm 0.1935  & z^{-3}  & - 1.033  & \pm 0.2873   & z^{-4} \\ 
  -0.2646 & \pm 0.3029  & z^{-5}  & - 1.415  & \pm 0.2352   & z^{-6} \\ 
  +0.4815 & \pm 0.2701  & z^{-8}  & + 1.313  & \pm 0.249    & z^{-8} \\ 
  +0.3993 & \pm 0.2877  & z^{-9}  & - 0.7446 & \pm 0.2492   & z^{-10} \\ 
  -1.7777 & \pm 0.2392  & z^{-11} & + 1.443  & \pm 0.2471   & z^{-12} \\ 
  -1.054  & \pm 0.2877  & z^{-13} & + 0.7    & \pm 0.277719 & z^{-14} \\ 
  +1.47   & \pm 0.1926  & z^{-15} & - 1.847  & \pm 0.20771  & z^{-16} \\ 
  +0.6023 & \pm 0.06359 & z^{-17}\makebox[0pt][l]{.}
  \end{array}
\end{align*}

\end{document}

enter image description here

2

As your original proposal. Maybe not so aesthetic, but it also works.

enter image description here

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\usepackage[usestackEOL]{stackengine}
\stackMath

\begin{document}

\[
C(Z)=\frac{
\Longstack[l]{-0.5002 (\pm 0.1000)\,z^{-1} + 2.161 (\pm 0.1821)\,z^{-2} 
                -1.744 (\pm 0.1489)\,z^{-3} - 2.138 (\pm 0.2009)\,z^{-4} \\
                +2.0073 (\pm 0.2002)\,z^{-5} + 1.047 (\pm 0.1986)\,z^{-6} 
                -1.124  (\pm 0.1978)\,z^{-7} - 2.1009(\pm 0.2176)\,z^{-8} \\
                +0.1732 (\pm 0.1959)\,z^{-9} + 2.305 (\pm 0.2109)\,z^{-10} 
                +0.7807 (\pm 0.1846)\,z^{-11}- 1.436 (\pm 0.225 )\,z^{-12} \\
                -2.605  (\pm 0.2003)\,z^{-13}+ 2.405 (\pm 0.2306)\,z^{-14} 
                +1.517  (\pm 0.1872)\,z^{-15}- 2.244 (\pm 0.1778)\,z^{-16} \\ 
                +0.6634 (\pm 0.05466)\,z^{-19}}
                }
                {
\Longstack[l]{1-2.738  (\pm 0.07274)\,z^{-1}+ 1.241 (\pm 0.2085)\,z^{-2} 
              +1.997  (\pm 0.1935)\,z^{-3} - 1.033 (\pm 0.2873)\,z^{-4} \\
              -0.2646 (\pm 0.3029)\,z^{-5} - 1.415 (\pm 0.2352)\,z^{-6} 
              +0.4815 (\pm 0.2701)\,z^{-8} + 1.313 (\pm 0.249 )\,z^{-8} \\
              +0.3993 (\pm 0.2877)\,z^{-9} - 0.7446(\pm 0.2492)\,z^{-10} 
              -1.7777 (\pm 0.2392)\,z^{-11}+ 1.443 (\pm 0.2471)\,z^{-12} \\
              -1.054  (\pm 0.2877)\,z^{-13}+ 0.7   (\pm 0.277719)\,z^{-14} 
              +1.47   (\pm 0.1926)\,z^{-15}- 1.847 (\pm 0.20771)\,z^{-16} \\
              +0.6023 (\pm 0.06359)\,z^{-17}}
              }
\]

\end{document}
1

Don't try to put all of that stuff in the equation. Instead, write the numerator and denominator as a summation, and put the coefficients and error estimates in a table.

\begin{equation}
C(z) = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{19} a_i z^{-i}}{1 + \sum_{i=1}^{17} b_i z^{-i}}.
\end{equation}
The coefficients $a_i$ and $b_i$ are given with their error estimates in
Table~\ref{tbl:coefs}.

Not only will this be easier to read and understand than any of the suggestions that include the coefficients in the equation, having the coefficients in a table makes it easier to extract them for someone wanting to do the calculation. Some journals will even automatically generate a csv file that can be downloaded separately from the article text.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.