1

I don't understand what is wrong with the code below:

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}

\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}

\usepackage{calc}
\usepackage{ifthen}

\usepackage[french]{babel}

\newcounter{a}
\newcounter{b}

\newcommand{\reste}[2]{
\setcounter{a}{#1}
\setcounter{b}{#2}
\whiledo{\(\thea > \theb\) \OR \(\thea = \theb\)}{
\setcounter{a}{\thea - \theb}
}
\thea
}

\newcounter{p}
\newcounter{q}
\newcounter{t}

\newcommand{\pgcd}[2]{
\setcounter{p}{#1}
\setcounter{q}{#2}
\whiledo{\theq > 0}{
\setcounter{t}{\reste{\thep}{\theq}}
\setcounter{p}{\theq}
\setcounter{q}{\thet}
}
\thep
}

\begin{document}

Le reste dans la division entière de $29$ par $6$ est $\reste{29}{6}$.

Le reste dans la division entière de $30$ par $6$ est $\reste{30}{6}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $29$ et $6$ est $\pgcd{29}{6}$.

\end{document}
Improve this question
6
  • Welcome to TeX.SE. Can you please explain what your desired outcome is? And if you're getting errors or an unexpected output, you should add that to the question as well.
    – TivV
    Feb 25, 2020 at 9:48
  • I would like to let latex compute the gcd of 29 and 6, but it doesn't compile indeed. The calculus of the modulus is correct, but i think i cannot call \reste from inside of \pgcd. I don't know how to do that.
    – Pascal CHAUVIN
    Feb 25, 2020 at 9:58
  • I guess the problem arises with the line "\setcounter{t}{\reste{\thep}{\theq}}".
    – Pascal CHAUVIN
    Feb 25, 2020 at 10:03
  • The usual problem: \reste{\thep}{\theq} is a set of instructions to print the rest of the division, it doesn't just deliver the rest as a number.
    – egreg
    Feb 25, 2020 at 10:10
  • I agree with that (egreg), so the question is how to get the result of \reste as a number ?
    – Pascal CHAUVIN
    Feb 25, 2020 at 10:29

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
4

You need to use pure expansion:

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[french]{babel}

\makeatletter
\newcommand{\reste}[2]{%
  \ifnum#1<#2
    \expandafter\@firstoftwo
  \else
    \expandafter\@secondoftwo
  \fi
  {#1}{\expandafter\reste\expandafter{\the\numexpr#1-#2}{#2}}%
}

\newcommand{\pgcd}[2]{%
  \ifnum#1<#2
    \expandafter\@firstoftwo
  \else
    \expandafter\@secondoftwo
  \fi
  {\@pgcd{#2}{#1}}{\@pgcd{#1}{#2}}%
}
\newcommand{\@pgcd}[2]{%
  \ifnum#2=0
    \expandafter\@firstoftwo
  \else
    \expandafter\@secondoftwo
  \fi
  {#1}{\expandafter\@@pgcd\expandafter{\expanded{\reste{#1}{#2}}}{#2}}%
}
\newcommand{\@@pgcd}[2]{\@pgcd{#2}{#1}}

\makeatother

\begin{document}

Le reste dans la division entière de $29$ par $6$ est $\reste{29}{6}$.

Le reste dans la division entière de $30$ par $6$ est $\reste{30}{6}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $29$ et $6$ est $\pgcd{29}{6}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $42$ et $12$ est $\pgcd{42}{12}$.

\end{document}

The \reste macro is called recursively until the first argument is less than the second.

Similarly, \pgcd checks the size of its arguments, reversing them if necessary. Then it calls \@pgcd that calls recursively itself computing the rest, as usual. The auxiliary \@@pgcd is useful to reverse the arguments and make it easier to poke into the first one with \expandafter.

Using \expanded allows for using \reste without worrying about the number of expansions it requires to deliver its result.

enter image description here

Here's a different version using higher level tools:

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[french]{babel}
\usepackage{xparse}

\ExplSyntaxOn
\cs_set_eq:NN \reste \int_mod:nn

\NewExpandableDocumentCommand{\pgcd}{mm}
 {
  \int_compare:nTF { #1 < #2 }
   { \chauvin_pgcd:nn { #2 } { #1 } }
   { \chauvin_pgcd:nn { #1 } { #2 } }
 }

\cs_new:Nn \chauvin_pgcd:nn
 {
  \int_compare:nTF { #2 = 0 }
   { #1 }
   {
    \chauvin_pgcd:nn { #2 } { \int_mod:nn { #1 } { #2 } }
   }
 }
\ExplSyntaxOff

\begin{document}

Le reste dans la division entière de $29$ par $6$ est $\reste{29}{6}$.

Le reste dans la division entière de $30$ par $6$ est $\reste{30}{6}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $29$ et $6$ est $\pgcd{29}{6}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $42$ et $12$ est $\pgcd{42}{12}$.

\end{document}
Improve this answer
6
  • What is “pure expansion”?
    – Henri Menke
    Feb 25, 2020 at 10:37
  • @HenriMenke tex.stackexchange.com/search?q=pure+expansion
    – egreg
    Feb 25, 2020 at 10:39
  • Thaks a lot egreg ! Both solutions are fine !
    – Pascal CHAUVIN
    Feb 25, 2020 at 10:57
  • @egreg "The \reste macro is called recursively until the first argument is less than the second." I am not sure to understand this sentence ; "\reste" has been written as an imperative function, and not the recursive way here.
    – Pascal CHAUVIN
    Feb 25, 2020 at 11:05
  • @PascalCHAUVIN In my first code, \reste calls itself (with different arguments) until the first argument is less than the second. In the second code it is an alias to an expl3 function (that's internally defined via recursion).
    – egreg
    Feb 25, 2020 at 11:09
2

Some preliminary remarks about how (La)TeX works:

The command \the⟨counter⟩ may not only deliver digit-tokens in range 0..9 which denote the value of the counter. It may also deliver (non-expandable) tokens for pretty-printing the value which disturb calculation and \setcounter-assignments.

Instead use \number\value{⟨counter⟩}.

Desite expl3's misleading terminology where the word "function" is used a lot, the programming-paradigma of LaTeX is not a procedural/functional one as is the case with high level programming languages like C++ or Java, but is rather a macro-based declarative and symbolic one, where the symbols are formed by so-called tokens and where symbols/tokens get replaced by other symbols/tokens during the stage of expansion.

In Knuth's analogy to a digestive process TeX has

  • eyes
  • a digestive tract
  • the ability to produce tokens and put them into its mouth where the digestion process begins.

TeX's eyes read the .tex-input-file. Hereby TeX takes the input for a set of instructions for producing tokens and putting these tokens into its mouth one by one. So the tokens form a "token-stream" whose elements one by one are lead through TeX's digestive tract.

Expansion of a(n expandable) token—i.e., replacement of that token (and probably those tokens that form its arguments) by other tokens—takes place while tokens are transported through TeX's gullet.

Assignments (defining macros, assigning values to \count-registers and the like) in that analogy take place in TeX's stomach.

The final result of TeX's digestion-process will be the resulting output-files (.pdf-file/.dvi-file, .log-file, auxiliary files like the .aux-files and .toc-file and .lot/.lof-file etc) and things that are written to the console.

A crucial point hereby is:

TeX-⟨number⟩-quantities must be formed in TeX's gullet, during the stage of expansion, so that the token-sequence which forms the TeX-⟨number⟩-quantity is available in TeX's stomach where assignments etc are performed.
\setcounter implies assigning (in LaTeX's stomach) to the \count-register that underlies the LaTeX-counter in question a value which is delivered through LaTeX's gullet (where expansion takes place) as a token-sequence which forms a TeX-⟨number⟩-quantity.

So the result of expanding a macro is not just the final value. The result is a set of tokens/symbols that get inserted into the token-stream.

E.g., with 

\newcommand{\reste}[2]{%
  \setcounter{a}{#1}%
  \setcounter{b}{#2}%
  \whiledo{\(\thea>\theb\)\OR\(\thea=\theb\)}{%
    \setcounter{a}{\thea-\theb}%
  }%
  \thea
}

the result of expanding \reste{29}{6} will not just be the final thingie that comes from \thea.
The result will be removing the token-sequence

\restecontrol-word-token,
{explicit catcode-1(begin-group)-character-token,
2explicit catcode-12(other)-character-token,
9explicit catcode-12(other)-character-token,
}explicit catcode-2(end-group)-character-token,
{explicit catcode-1(begin-group)-character-token,
6explicit catcode-12(other)-character-token,
}explicit catcode-2(end-group)-character-token

from the token-stream and instead of that token-sequence inserting the token-sequence

\setcountercontrol-word-token,
{explicit catcode-1(begin-group)-character-token,
aexplicit catcode-11(letter)-character-token,
}explicit catcode-2(end-group)-character-token,
{explicit catcode-1(begin-group)-character-token,
2explicit catcode-12(other)-character-token,
9explicit catcode-12(other)-character-token,
}explicit catcode-2(end-group)-character-token,
\setcountercontrol-word-token,
{explicit catcode-1(begin-group)-character-token,
bexplicit catcode-11(letter)-character-token,
}explicit catcode-2(end-group)-character-token,
{explicit catcode-1(begin-group)-character-token,
6explicit catcode-12(other)-character-token,
}explicit catcode-2(end-group)-character-token,
\whiledocontrol-word-token,
{explicit catcode-1(begin-group)-character-token,
\(control-symbol-token,
\theacontrol-word-token,
>explicit catcode-12(other)-character-token,
\thebcontrol-word-token,
\)control-symbol-token,
\ORcontrol-word-token,
\(control-symbol-token,
\theacontrol-word-token,
=explicit catcode-12(other)-character-token,
\thebcontrol-word-token,
\)control-symbol-token,
}explicit catcode-2(end-group)-character-token,
{explicit catcode-1(begin-group)-character-token,
\setcountercontrol-word-token,
{explicit catcode-1(begin-group)-character-token,
aexplicit catcode-11(letter)-character-token,
}explicit catcode-2(end-group)-character-token,
{explicit catcode-1(begin-group)-character-token,
\theacontrol-word-token,
-explicit catcode-12(other)-character-token,
\thebcontrol-word-token,
}explicit catcode-2(end-group)-character-token,
}explicit catcode-2(end-group)-character-token,
\theacontrol-word-token

into the token-stream.

That removal and insertion takes place in LaTeX's gullet.

Armed with this knowledge, it becomes obvious that

\setcounter{t}{\reste{\thep}{\theq}}

cannot work:

The second argument of a \setcounter directive is expected to be a set of tokens whose elements after expansion only yield components of a TeX-⟨number⟩-quantity.

But the result of expanding \reste{\thep}{\theq}, which is inside the second argument of the \setcounter{t}{...}-directive, does not only yield components of a TeX-⟨number⟩-quantity.

That result also contains tokens unrelated to denoting components of TeX-⟨number⟩-quantities.
E.g., the (nested) directives \setcounter{a}{\thep} and \setcounter{b}{\theq}.
E.g., the \whiledo-directive.

The (nested) \setcounter-directives (beneath other things) at the stage of expansion in LaTeX's gullet yield tokens that don't denote digits/components of a TeX-⟨number⟩-quantity but denote the action of assigning a value to a LaTeX-counter/of assigning a value to the TeX-\count-register that underlies the LaTeX-counter in question.
These assignment-denoting-tokens that come from the nested \setcounter-directives disturb the surrounding \setcounter{t}{...}-directive when that directive's underlying \count-register-assignment gets carried out in LaTeX's stomach.

With the \whiledo-directive the result is not delivered by doing expansion (in LaTeX's gullet) only. \whiledo also (in LaTeX's stomach) performs temporary assignments. The tokens underlying these temporary assignments are not tokens that yield components of a TeX-⟨number⟩-quantity. Therefore they also "disturb" the \setcounter{t}{...}-assignment.

(Within the "nested" \setcounter-directives \setcounter{a}{\thep} and \setcounter{b}{\theq} themselves there might be basically the same problem:

Unlike with \number\value{⟨counter⟩} it is not guaranteed that \the⟨counter⟩ delivers a set of tokens whose elements only yield components of a TeX-⟨number⟩-quantity. With \the⟨counter⟩ there might be things/tokens for "pretty-printing" which cannot be components of a TeX-⟨number⟩-quantity and which therefore "disturb" the \setcounter-assignment.)

How to resolve the issue?

With \reste you can, e.g., have an optional argument which denotes the tokens that are to be inserted behind these tokens that yield assigning the desired value to the LaTeX-counter a.

Modifying as few things of your code as possible, you can probably get the desired results as follows:

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}

\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}

\usepackage{calc}
\usepackage{ifthen}

\usepackage[french]{babel}

\newcounter{a}
\newcounter{b}

\newcommand{\reste}[3][\thea]{%
  \setcounter{a}{#2}%
  \setcounter{b}{#3}%
  \whiledo{\(\number\value{a}>\number\value{b}\)\OR\(\number\value{a}=\number\value{b}\)}%
          {\setcounter{a}{\number\value{a}-\number\value{b}}}%
  #1%
}

\newcounter{p}
\newcounter{q}
\newcounter{t}

\newcommand{\pgcd}[3][\thep]{%
  \setcounter{p}{#2}%
  \setcounter{q}{#3}%
  \whiledo{\number\value{q}>0}{%
    \reste[{\setcounter{t}{\number\value{a}}}]{\number\value{p}}{\number\value{q}}%
    \setcounter{p}{\number\value{q}}%
    \setcounter{q}{\number\value{t}}%
  }%
  #1%
}

\begin{document}

Le reste dans la division entière de $29$ par $6$ est $\reste{29}{6}$.

Le reste dans la division entière de $30$ par $6$ est $\reste{30}{6}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $29$ et $6$ est $\pgcd{29}{6}$.

\end{document}

enter image description here

If \numexpr of the ε-TeX-extensions is available, you can get the result without using LaTeX-counters at all.

Instead of LaTeX-counters use macro-arguments for holding values during the expansion-cascade:

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}

\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}

\usepackage[french]{babel}
\usepackage{amsmath}

\makeatletter
\newcommand\PassFirstToSecond[2]{#2{#1}}%
\newcommand{\reste}[3]{%
  % #1 = marker what the remainder shall look like;
  %      Assume: (integer divisor) = (integer dividend)*(integer number K) + (integer remainder)
  %        p/P = remainder positive
  %        s/S = remainder with same sign as dividend
  %        v/V or anything else = remainder with smallest absolute value 
  % #2 = divisor
  % #3 = dividend
  \romannumeral0%
  \ifnum#3=0 %
    \expandafter\@firstoftwo
  \else
     \expandafter\@secondoftwo
  \fi
  { \text{non-défini}}%
  {%
    \PassFirstToSecond{#1}{%
      \ifnum#3<0 \expandafter\@firstoftwo\else\expandafter\@secondoftwo\fi
      {\PassFirstToSecond{-}}%
      {\PassFirstToSecond{}}%
      {%
        \ifnum#2<0 \expandafter\@firstoftwo\else\expandafter\@secondoftwo\fi
        {\PassFirstToSecond{-}}%
        {\PassFirstToSecond{}}%
        {%
          \expandafter\PassFirstToSecond\expandafter{\number\ifnum#3<0 -\fi\number#3}{%
            \expandafter\PassFirstToSecond\expandafter{\number\ifnum#2<0 -\fi\number#2}{\resteloop}%
          }%
        }%
      }%
    }%
  }%
}%
\@ifdefinable\gobbletoexclam{\long\def\gobbletoexclam#1!{}}%
\@ifdefinable\forkpsv{\long\def\forkpsv#1!p!s!v!P!S!V!#2#3!!!!{#2}}%
\newcommand\psvfork[4]{%
  % #1 = argument to check
  % #2 = tokens in case argument to check is p or P
  % #3 = tokens in case argument to check is s or S
  % #4 = tokens in case argument to check is something else.
  \if\relax\detokenize\expandafter{\gobbletoexclam#1!}\relax
    \expandafter\@firstoftwo
  \else
    \expandafter\@secondoftwo
  \fi
  {%
    \forkpsv!#1!s!v!P!S!V!{#2}% <- case p
            !p!#1!v!P!S!V!{#3}% <- case s
            !p!s!#1!P!S!V!{#4}% <- case v
            !p!s!v!#1!S!V!{#2}% <- case P
            !p!s!v!P!#1!V!{#3}% <- case S
            !p!s!v!P!S!#1!{#4}% <- case V
            !p!s!v!P!S!V!{#4}% <- case something else without !
            !!!!%
  }%
  {#4}% <- case something else with !
  % The fork internally has eight branches:
  %  1. p
  %  2. s
  %  3. v
  %  4. P
  %  5. S
  %  6. V
  %  7. something else without "!"
  %  8. something else with "!"
  % Branches 1 and 4 collapse into one branch.
  % Branches 2 and 5 collapse into one branch.
  % Branches 3, 6, 7 and 8 collapse into one branch.
  % Thus you could instead implement a fork with six branches:
  %  1. p
  %  2. s
  %  3. P
  %  4. S
  %  5. something else without "!"
  %  6. something else with "!"
  % and collapse branches 1 and 3 into one branch
  % and branches 2 and 4 into one branch
  % and branches 5 and 6 into one branch.
  % But this way introducing different behavior for case v or V
  % than for case something else with or without "!" is more
  % easy if needed. (You may wish the triggering of error-
  % messages in the latter case rather than the same behavior as in
  % case v/V.)
}%
\newcommand{\resteloop}[5]{%
  % #1 = absolute value of divisor (digit sequence)
  % #2 = absolute value of dividend (digit sequence)
  % #3 = sign of divisor (empty = not negative; - = negative)
  % #4 = sign of dividend (empty = not negative; - = negative)
  % #5 = marker what the remainder shall look like;
  %     Assume: (integer divisor) = (integer dividend)*(integer number K) + (integer remainder)
  %      p/P = remainder positive
  %      s/S = remainder with same sign as dividend
  %      v/V or anything else = remainder with smallest absolute value 
  \ifnum#1<#2 \expandafter\@secondoftwo\else\expandafter\@firstoftwo\fi
  {\expandafter\resteloop\expandafter{\number\numexpr#1-#2\relax}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#5}}%
  {%
     \psvfork{#5}{%
        %Case p/P:
       \ifx\relax#3\relax\expandafter\@secondoftwo\else\expandafter\@firstoftwo\fi
       {%
         \@firstofone{\expandafter} \number\numexpr\number#3#1+#2\relax
       }%
       {%
         \@firstofone{\expandafter} \number#3#1%
       }%
     }{%
        %Case s/S:
       \ifx\relax#3\relax\expandafter\@secondoftwo\else\expandafter\@firstoftwo\fi
       {%
         \ifx\relax#4\relax\expandafter\@firstoftwo\else\expandafter\@secondoftwo\fi
         {%remainder negative module positive
           \@firstofone{\expandafter} \number\numexpr\ifnum#1=0 \else#2+\fi\number#3#1\relax
         }{% remainder negative module negative
           \@firstofone{\expandafter} \number#3#1%
         }%
       }{%
         \ifx\relax#4\relax\expandafter\@firstoftwo\else\expandafter\@secondoftwo\fi
         {%   remainder positive module positive
           \@firstofone{\expandafter} \number#3#1%
         }{%   remainder positive module negative
           \@firstofone{\expandafter} \number\numexpr\ifnum#1=0 \else-#2+\fi\number#3#1\relax
         }%
       }%
     }{%
        %Case someting else, e.g. v/V:
       \ifnum\number\numexpr#2-#1\relax<#1 %
       \expandafter\@firstoftwo\else\expandafter\@secondoftwo\fi
       {%
         \@firstofone{\expandafter} \number\numexpr\ifnum\number#3#1<0 \else-\fi#2+\number#3#1\relax
       }{%
         \@firstofone{\expandafter} \number#3#1%
       }%
     }%
  }%
}%
\newcommand{\pgcd}[2]{%
  % #1 = first integer number
  % #2 = second integer number
  \romannumeral0%
  \ifnum#1=0 \expandafter\@firstofone\else\expandafter\@secondoftwo\fi
  {%
    \ifnum#2=0 \expandafter\@firstoftwo\else\expandafter\@secondoftwo\fi
    { \text{non-défini}}%
  }%
  {%
    \expandafter\PassFirstToSecond\expandafter{%
      \number\ifnum#2<0 -\fi\number#2%
    }{%
      \expandafter\PassFirstToSecond\expandafter{%
        \number\ifnum#1<0 -\fi\number#1%
      }{\pgcdloop}%
    }%
  }%
}%
\newcommand{\pgcdloop}[2]{%
  \ifnum#2>0 \expandafter\@firstoftwo\else\expandafter\@secondoftwo\fi
  {%
    \expandafter\PassFirstToSecond\expandafter{%
      \romannumeral0\resteloop{#1}{#2}{}{}{p}%
    }{\pgcdloop{#2}}%
  }%
  { #1}%
}
\makeatother

\begin{document}

\footnotesize\parindent=0ex

Le reste avec la valeur absolue la plus petite dans la division entière de $0$ par $6$ est $\reste{v}{0}{6}$.\\
Le reste avec le meme signe que le module dans la division entière de $0$ par $6$ est $\reste{s}{0}{6}$.\\
Le reste avec valeur positive dans la division entière de $0$ par $6$ est $\reste{p}{0}{6}$.\\

Le reste avec la valeur absolue la plus petite dans la division entière de $6$ par $0$ est $\reste{v}{6}{0}$.\\
Le reste avec le meme signe que le module dans la division entière de $6$ par $0$ est $\reste{s}{6}{0}$.\\
Le reste avec valeur positive dans la division entière de $6$ par $0$ est $\reste{p}{6}{0}$.\\

Le reste avec la valeur absolue la plus petite dans la division entière de $29$ par $6$ est $\reste{v}{29}{6}$.\\
Le reste avec le meme signe que le module dans la division entière de $29$ par $6$ est $\reste{s}{29}{6}$.\\
Le reste avec valeur positive dans la division entière de $29$ par $6$ est $\reste{p}{29}{6}$.\\

Le reste avec la valeur absolue la plus petite dans la division entière de $29$ par $-6$ est $\reste{v}{29}{-6}$.\\
Le reste avec le meme signe que le module dans la division entière de $29$ par $-6$ est $\reste{s}{29}{-6}$.\\
Le reste avec valeur positive dans la division entière de $29$ par $-6$ est $\reste{p}{29}{-6}$.\\

Le reste avec la valeur absolue la plus petite dans la division entière de $-29$ par $6$ est $\reste{v}{-29}{6}$.\\
Le reste avec le meme signe que le module dans la division entière de $-29$ par $6$ est $\reste{s}{-29}{6}$.\\
Le reste avec valeur positive dans la division entière de $-29$ par $6$ est $\reste{p}{-29}{6}$.\\

Le reste avec la valeur absolue la plus petite dans la division entière de $-29$ par $-6$ est $\reste{v}{-29}{-6}$.\\
Le reste avec le meme signe que le module dans la division entière de $-29$ par $-6$ est $\reste{s}{-29}{-6}$.\\
Le reste avec valeur positive dans la division entière de $-29$ par $-6$ est $\reste{p}{-29}{-6}$.\\

Le reste avec la valeur absolue la plus petite dans la division entière de $30$ par $6$ est $\reste{v}{30}{6}$.\\
Le reste avec le meme signe que le module dans la division entière de $30$ par $6$ est $\reste{s}{30}{6}$.\\
Le reste avec valeur positive dans la division entière de $30$ par $6$ est $\reste{p}{30}{6}$.\\

Le reste avec la valeur absolue la plus petite dans la division entière de $30$ par $-6$ est $\reste{v}{30}{-6}$.\\
Le reste avec le meme signe que le module dans la division entière de $30$ par $-6$ est $\reste{s}{30}{-6}$.\\
Le reste avec valeur positive dans la division entière de $30$ par $-6$ est $\reste{p}{30}{-6}$.\\

Le reste avec la valeur absolue la plus petite dans la division entière de $0$ par $0$ est $\reste{v}{0}{0}$.\\
Le reste avec le meme signe que le module dans la division entière de $0$ par $0$ est $\reste{s}{0}{0}$.\\
Le reste avec valeur positive dans la division entière de $0$ par $0$ est $\reste{p}{0}{0}$.\\

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $29$ et $6$ est $\pgcd{29}{6}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $0$ et $6290$ est $\pgcd{0}{6290}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $6324$ et $0$ est $\pgcd{6324}{0}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $0$ et $-6290$ est $\pgcd{0}{-6290}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $-6324$ et $0$ est $\pgcd{-6324}{0}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $6324$ et $6290$ est $\pgcd{6324}{6290}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $-6324$ et $6290$ est $\pgcd{-6324}{6290}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $6324$ et $-6290$ est $\pgcd{6324}{-6290}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $-6324$ et $-6290$ est $\pgcd{-6324}{-6290}$.

Le plus grand commun diviseur de $0$ et $0$ est $\pgcd{0}{0}$.

\end{document}

enter image description here

Improve this answer
1
  • Very, very interesting : thank you !!!
    – Pascal CHAUVIN
    Feb 27, 2020 at 8:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.