0
\documentclass{article} 

\begin{document}
$$\underset {{x}_1,{h}_1,{m}_2,{b}_2}{max} {u}_1(x)_1-{h}_1+{\beta}_1{W}_2({m}_2,{b}_2)$$

\end{document}

This is the problem I met, sublime text can display the equation but when I run this code, a warning "Undefined control sequence. [$$\underset]" showed.

4

Welcome! You should not use \underset here but the \max operator. Nor should you use $$ ... $$ but \[ ... \] instead. (I am also wondering why you wrap so many symbols in {...}.)

\documentclass{article} 
\begin{document}
\[\max_{x_1,h_1,m_2,b_2} u_1(x)_1-h_1+\beta_1W_2(m_2,b_2)\]
\end{document}

enter image description here

1

The \underset command requires amsmath.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}    % <----- don't forget

\begin{document}

\[
\underset{x+y+z}{a+b+c+d+e+f+g}
\]

\end{document}

On the other hand, you don't need \underset for your case, as already suggested. The “max” operator is obtained with the command \max and

\[
\max_{1\le k\le n} x_k
\]

will yield the expected output.

I keep seeing code plagued with \underset{x\rightarrow 0}{lim}, where the simpler

\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}

would suffice, besides producing a better output.

0

enter image description here

\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\begin{document}

       $$\underset {{x}_1,{h}_1,{m}_2,{b}_2}{max} {u}_1(x)_1-{h}_1+{\beta}_1{W}_2({m}_2,{b}_2)$$
\end{document}
2
  • 4
    Please write \max, not max.
    – Mico
    May 6 '20 at 4:46
  • Sorry, but this is bad advice.
    – egreg
    May 6 '20 at 9:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.