In an overleaf document using \documentclass[a4paper,15pt]{scrartcl}, I wrote some text and thereafter, I wrote something like $$ c^2=a^2+(-b)^2=a^2+b^2 $$ (Not this equation, please see the attached code below) followed by a new paragraph. But, the problem is that the equation seems to be sandwiched between the two texts. Here's the code :

...where $\mathbf{R_2}\vec{x}=\vec{0}$ as $\mathbf{R_2}$ is a zero matrix. So, now we have


Now, if $\mathbf{A}$ is of full column rank, then its QR decomposition is unique, hence $\mathbf{Q}$ and $\mathbf{R}$ (And thus, $\mathbf{R_1}$ are fixed.

But, in some previous portions of the document, I've written things like below and in this case, the spacing seem perfectly fine to me. See below :

...The proof is following : $$\norm{\mathbf{G}\vec{x}}~=\sqrt{\left(\mathbf{G}\vec{x}\right)'\cdot\mathbf{G}\vec{x}}~=\sqrt{\vec{x}'\big(\mathbf{G}'\mathbf{G}\big)\vec{x}}=\sqrt{\vec{x}'\vec{x}}~=\norm{\vec{x}}$$

$\bullet~~\textbf{\colorbox{magicmint}{Fact \#3} :}~$ If the matrix $A$ is of full column rank, then it has a unique QR Decomposition.

Here, previously I've written


I tried using \begin{equation*}, but it's producing the same output. :(

Can anyone please help ? Thanks in advance. :)

  • 3
    Don't use $$ for display math, see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/503/why-is-preferable-to. Beside this: if you want help you will have to show a small complete example. Screenshots are not enough. – Ulrike Fischer May 28 '20 at 14:48
  • 2
    it is impossible to tell without an example but note that the space around displays can stretch or shrink. If you are using a document class that uses \flushbottom this vertical space can change to ensure equal page lengths just as inter-word space changes on a line to maintain equal line lengths – David Carlisle May 28 '20 at 14:52
  • Ohk fine. Let me write some code snippets. – Kolmogorov May 28 '20 at 14:57
  • 2
    code snippets are not "a small complete example". But don't use empty lines around display math. This math belongs to the paragraph. – Ulrike Fischer May 28 '20 at 15:09
  • 2
    Your code contains an empty line, which generates a paragraph break, before the first instance of $$...$$ but not before the second. The iron rule of TeX and LaTeX says: never, ever, permit a paragraph break before starting a display-math group. – Mico May 28 '20 at 15:23

You claim,

in both the cases, I've written the codes in the exact similar manner. But why are the vertical spacings different for the two cases?

In fact, there is a crucial difference between the ways you wrote the two instances of $$...$$: In the former there's a blank line right before $$...$$, whereas in the latter there's not.

Blank lines in TeX and LaTeX documents trigger a paragraph break. There is an Iron Rule in TeX and LaTeX: Never, ever place a paragraph break immediately before a displaymath entity -- be this $$...$$, \[...\], \begin{equation} ... \end{equation}, or what have you. Taking out the blank line immediately improves the spacing situation.

An MWE (minimum working example) that's based on your code fragment:

enter image description here

For the second case, I also removed all the ~ spacers.

\usepackage{mathtools} % for '\DeclarePairedDelimiter' macro

\subsubsection*{With the spurious blank line}

\dots where $\mathbf{R}_2\vec{x}=\vec{0}$ as 
$\mathbf{R}_2$ is a zero matrix. So, now we have


\subsubsection*{Without the spurious blank line}

\dots where $\mathbf{R}_2\vec{x}=\vec{0}$ as 
$\mathbf{R}_2$ is a zero matrix. So, now we have
  • Thank you. It really helped. :) – Kolmogorov May 28 '20 at 16:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.