5

This is a follow up to TeX capacity exceeded while parsing a date string

I want to compare two dates, say today's date and a due date. I have the due date information stored (as number strings) in macros \dueday, \duemonth, and \duemonth. I use the following, from etoolbox package:

\newcommand{\dueday}{6}
\newcommand{\duemonth}{5} % May
\newcommand{\dueyear}{2012}

\ifboolexpr{
    (test {\ifnumcomp{\dueyear}{>}{\year}})
    or (test {\ifnumcomp{\dueyear}{=}{\year}} and test {\ifnumcomp{\duemonth}{>}{\month}})
    or (test {\ifnumcomp{\dueyear}{=}{\year}} and test {\ifnumcomp{\duemonth}{=}{\month}} and test {\ifnumcomp{\dueday}{>}{\day}})
    }
    {Not due yet}
    {Due immediately}

which does work, but I'm looking for a TeX-based solution that, perhaps, can do this more efficiently and without having to use etoolbox.

  • You may want to try \pdfstrcmp. – Ali Mehrizi May 6 '12 at 19:21
7

This is doable using a series of pure number (\ifnum) tests, where the boolean logic is indicated by an 'outer' test which uses only 0/1:

\def\dueday{6}
\def\duemonth{5} % May
\def\dueyear{2012}

\def\notdue{Not due yet}
\def\duenow{Due immediately}

\ifnum
  \ifnum\dueyear>\year
    0 %
  \else
    \ifnum\duemonth>\month
      0 %
    \else
      \ifnum\dueday>\day
        0 %
      \else
        1 %
      \fi  
    \fi
  \fi
  > 0 %
  \expandafter\duenow
\else
  \expandafter\notdue
\fi

\bye
  • 1
    A pure TeX-based approach, so I've used plain TeX, hence the \bye. – Joseph Wright May 6 '12 at 19:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.